COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial, residential, bare soil, vegetation, fores...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Editura Universitatii din Oradea
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdf |
id |
doaj-c7906d65e6ae4776b06db3cd315e6bb6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7906d65e6ae4776b06db3cd315e6bb62020-11-24T23:36:47ZengEditura Universitatii din OradeaAnalele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie 1221-12732065-34092014-12-01242143157COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERYVictor STRÎMBU0Vlad STRÎMBU1Wesley PALMER2Jean GOURD3Norwegian University of Live Sciences, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Høgskoleveien 12, 1430 Ås, Norway, e-mail: victor.strimbu@nmbu.no University of Alberta, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta 2-14 Agriculture Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2P5, e-mail: strimbu@ualberta.ca Louisiana Tech University, Colege of Applied and Natural Sciences,School of Forestry, Louisiana Tech University, P. O. Box 10138, Ruston, LA 71272, USA, e-mail: wpalmer@latech.eduLouisiana Tech University, Colege of Engineering and Science, Department of Computer Science Louisiana Tech University, Nethken Hall 247, Ruston, LA 71272, USA, e-mail: jgourd@latech.edu Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial, residential, bare soil, vegetation, forest and water. A brief background for each classification method was provided, after which the results of each algorithm were visually compared and analyzed. Finally, the kappa coefficient was used as a quantitative metric to asses the agreement between methods. This study showed that different results are obtained when using different classification methods; in consequence the classification method must be carefully selected according to the objective and the available data.. The finality of this work is to provide the average GIS software user with the understanding on how the classification method impacts the classification result, and a starting point in deciding what GIS software tool would be more appropriate given a certain context and goal. http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdfArcGISERDAS Imaginegislandsatland cover |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Victor STRÎMBU Vlad STRÎMBU Wesley PALMER Jean GOURD |
spellingShingle |
Victor STRÎMBU Vlad STRÎMBU Wesley PALMER Jean GOURD COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie ArcGIS ERDAS Imagine gis landsat land cover |
author_facet |
Victor STRÎMBU Vlad STRÎMBU Wesley PALMER Jean GOURD |
author_sort |
Victor STRÎMBU |
title |
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY |
title_sort |
comparison of nine image classification methods on landsat 7 imagery |
publisher |
Editura Universitatii din Oradea |
series |
Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie |
issn |
1221-1273 2065-3409 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS
software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their
performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial,
residential, bare soil, vegetation, forest and water. A brief background for each classification
method was provided, after which the results of each algorithm were visually compared and
analyzed. Finally, the kappa coefficient was used as a quantitative metric to asses the
agreement between methods. This study showed that different results are obtained when using
different classification methods; in consequence the classification method must be carefully
selected according to the objective and the available data.. The finality of this work is to
provide the average GIS software user with the understanding on how the classification
method impacts the classification result, and a starting point in deciding what GIS software
tool would be more appropriate given a certain context and goal. |
topic |
ArcGIS ERDAS Imagine gis landsat land cover |
url |
http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT victorstrimbu comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery AT vladstrimbu comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery AT wesleypalmer comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery AT jeangourd comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery |
_version_ |
1725521603079438336 |