COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY

Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial, residential, bare soil, vegetation, fores...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor STRÎMBU, Vlad STRÎMBU, Wesley PALMER, Jean GOURD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Oradea 2014-12-01
Series:Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie
Subjects:
gis
Online Access:http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdf
id doaj-c7906d65e6ae4776b06db3cd315e6bb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7906d65e6ae4776b06db3cd315e6bb62020-11-24T23:36:47ZengEditura Universitatii din OradeaAnalele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie 1221-12732065-34092014-12-01242143157COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERYVictor STRÎMBU0Vlad STRÎMBU1Wesley PALMER2Jean GOURD3Norwegian University of Live Sciences, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Høgskoleveien 12, 1430 Ås, Norway, e-mail: victor.strimbu@nmbu.no University of Alberta, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta 2-14 Agriculture Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2P5, e-mail: strimbu@ualberta.ca Louisiana Tech University, Colege of Applied and Natural Sciences,School of Forestry, Louisiana Tech University, P. O. Box 10138, Ruston, LA 71272, USA, e-mail: wpalmer@latech.eduLouisiana Tech University, Colege of Engineering and Science, Department of Computer Science Louisiana Tech University, Nethken Hall 247, Ruston, LA 71272, USA, e-mail: jgourd@latech.edu Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial, residential, bare soil, vegetation, forest and water. A brief background for each classification method was provided, after which the results of each algorithm were visually compared and analyzed. Finally, the kappa coefficient was used as a quantitative metric to asses the agreement between methods. This study showed that different results are obtained when using different classification methods; in consequence the classification method must be carefully selected according to the objective and the available data.. The finality of this work is to provide the average GIS software user with the understanding on how the classification method impacts the classification result, and a starting point in deciding what GIS software tool would be more appropriate given a certain context and goal. http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdfArcGISERDAS Imaginegislandsatland cover
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victor STRÎMBU
Vlad STRÎMBU
Wesley PALMER
Jean GOURD
spellingShingle Victor STRÎMBU
Vlad STRÎMBU
Wesley PALMER
Jean GOURD
COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie
ArcGIS
ERDAS Imagine
gis
landsat
land cover
author_facet Victor STRÎMBU
Vlad STRÎMBU
Wesley PALMER
Jean GOURD
author_sort Victor STRÎMBU
title COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
title_short COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
title_full COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF NINE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHODS ON LANDSAT 7 IMAGERY
title_sort comparison of nine image classification methods on landsat 7 imagery
publisher Editura Universitatii din Oradea
series Analele Universităţii din Oradea: Seria Geografie
issn 1221-1273
2065-3409
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Nine different widely used classification methods available in ArcGIS and ERDAS software packages weretested on Landsat 7 imagery with the objective to compare their performance and adequacy in classifying six major land cover elements: urban/commercial, residential, bare soil, vegetation, forest and water. A brief background for each classification method was provided, after which the results of each algorithm were visually compared and analyzed. Finally, the kappa coefficient was used as a quantitative metric to asses the agreement between methods. This study showed that different results are obtained when using different classification methods; in consequence the classification method must be carefully selected according to the objective and the available data.. The finality of this work is to provide the average GIS software user with the understanding on how the classification method impacts the classification result, and a starting point in deciding what GIS software tool would be more appropriate given a certain context and goal.
topic ArcGIS
ERDAS Imagine
gis
landsat
land cover
url http://geografie-uoradea.ro/Reviste/Anale/Art/2014-2/7.AUOG_661_Victor.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT victorstrimbu comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery
AT vladstrimbu comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery
AT wesleypalmer comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery
AT jeangourd comparisonofnineimageclassificationmethodsonlandsat7imagery
_version_ 1725521603079438336