Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems

Enactivism and ecological psychology converge on the relevance of the environment in understanding perception and action. On both views, perceiving organisms are not merely passive receivers of environmental stimuli, but rather form a dynamic relationship with their environments in such a way that s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amanda Corris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01285/full
id doaj-c767ad09248042dc989526041a3fa8d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c767ad09248042dc989526041a3fa8d92020-11-25T03:40:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-07-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01285538312Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment SystemsAmanda CorrisEnactivism and ecological psychology converge on the relevance of the environment in understanding perception and action. On both views, perceiving organisms are not merely passive receivers of environmental stimuli, but rather form a dynamic relationship with their environments in such a way that shapes how they interact with the world. In this paper, I suggest that while enactivism and ecological psychology enjoy a shared specification of the environment as the cognitive domain, on both accounts, the structure of the environment, itself, is unspecified beyond that of contingent relations with the species-typical sensorimotor capacities of perceiving organisms. This lack of specification creates a considerable gap in theory regarding the organization of organisms as coupled with their environments. I argue that this gap can be filled by drawing from resources in developmental systems theory, namely, specifying the environmental state-space as a developmental niche that shapes and is shaped by individual organisms over developmental and, on a population scale, evolutionary time. Defining the environment as an organism’s developmental niche makes it clearer how and why certain contingencies have arisen, in turn, strengthening a joint appeal to both enactivism and ecological psychology as theories asserting complementarity between organisms and their environments.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01285/fullenactivismecological psychologydevelopmental systems theorydevelopmental nichenaturalization of perception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amanda Corris
spellingShingle Amanda Corris
Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
Frontiers in Psychology
enactivism
ecological psychology
developmental systems theory
developmental niche
naturalization of perception
author_facet Amanda Corris
author_sort Amanda Corris
title Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
title_short Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
title_full Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
title_fullStr Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
title_full_unstemmed Defining the Environment in Organism–Environment Systems
title_sort defining the environment in organism–environment systems
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Enactivism and ecological psychology converge on the relevance of the environment in understanding perception and action. On both views, perceiving organisms are not merely passive receivers of environmental stimuli, but rather form a dynamic relationship with their environments in such a way that shapes how they interact with the world. In this paper, I suggest that while enactivism and ecological psychology enjoy a shared specification of the environment as the cognitive domain, on both accounts, the structure of the environment, itself, is unspecified beyond that of contingent relations with the species-typical sensorimotor capacities of perceiving organisms. This lack of specification creates a considerable gap in theory regarding the organization of organisms as coupled with their environments. I argue that this gap can be filled by drawing from resources in developmental systems theory, namely, specifying the environmental state-space as a developmental niche that shapes and is shaped by individual organisms over developmental and, on a population scale, evolutionary time. Defining the environment as an organism’s developmental niche makes it clearer how and why certain contingencies have arisen, in turn, strengthening a joint appeal to both enactivism and ecological psychology as theories asserting complementarity between organisms and their environments.
topic enactivism
ecological psychology
developmental systems theory
developmental niche
naturalization of perception
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01285/full
work_keys_str_mv AT amandacorris definingtheenvironmentinorganismenvironmentsystems
_version_ 1724536921196068864