Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone

Abstract Background Personal logbooks are universally applied for monitoring and evaluation of surgical trainees; however, the quality and accuracy of such logbooks in low income countries (LICs) are poorly examined. Logbooks are kept by the individual trainee and detail every surgical procedure the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ø. V. Svendsen, C. Helgerud, A. J. van Duinen, Ø. Salvesen, P. M. George, H. A. Bolkan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1647-2
id doaj-c75c213c891046b487e7e7f70f2868b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c75c213c891046b487e7e7f70f2868b02020-11-25T03:50:57ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-06-011911710.1186/s12909-019-1647-2Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra LeoneØ. V. Svendsen0C. Helgerud1A. J. van Duinen2Ø. Salvesen3P. M. George4H. A. Bolkan5Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Faculty Administration, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Surgical Department, University of Sierra Leone Teaching HospitalDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Abstract Background Personal logbooks are universally applied for monitoring and evaluation of surgical trainees; however, the quality and accuracy of such logbooks in low income countries (LICs) are poorly examined. Logbooks are kept by the individual trainee and detail every surgical procedure they perform and their role during the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of such a logbook system in Sierra Leone and to identify areas of improvement. Methods The last 100 logbook entries for students and graduates participating in a surgical task sharing training programme were compared with hospital records (HRs). The logbook entries were categorized as matching, close matching or over-reported. Moreover, HRs were checked for under-reported procedures. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the study participants on logbook recording routines. The results were analysed using mixed effects logistic regression models. Results Three thousand one hundred sixty-nine database entries from 35 participants were analysed. Of that amount, 62.2% of the entries matched the HRs, 10.4% were close matches and 26.9% were over-reported. 20.7% of the investigated HRs were under-reported. Conclusions Information gathered from surgical logbook systems must be applied with care, and great efforts must be made to ensure that the logbook systems used provide reliable data. Based on analysis of the logbook data and interviews, focus areas are suggested to ensure reliable logbook data in LICs. Clear instructions and proper training should be provided when introducing the logbook system to the users. The importance of logging all procedures, including minor ones, should be emphasized. The logbook system should be user friendly and only as extensive as necessary. Lastly, keeping the logbooks exclusively digital is recommended, combined with sufficient IT equipment and training.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1647-2TrainingEducationGlobal surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ø. V. Svendsen
C. Helgerud
A. J. van Duinen
Ø. Salvesen
P. M. George
H. A. Bolkan
spellingShingle Ø. V. Svendsen
C. Helgerud
A. J. van Duinen
Ø. Salvesen
P. M. George
H. A. Bolkan
Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
BMC Medical Education
Training
Education
Global surgery
author_facet Ø. V. Svendsen
C. Helgerud
A. J. van Duinen
Ø. Salvesen
P. M. George
H. A. Bolkan
author_sort Ø. V. Svendsen
title Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
title_short Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
title_full Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
title_fullStr Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in Sierra Leone
title_sort evaluation of a surgical task sharing training programme’s logbook system in sierra leone
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Personal logbooks are universally applied for monitoring and evaluation of surgical trainees; however, the quality and accuracy of such logbooks in low income countries (LICs) are poorly examined. Logbooks are kept by the individual trainee and detail every surgical procedure they perform and their role during the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of such a logbook system in Sierra Leone and to identify areas of improvement. Methods The last 100 logbook entries for students and graduates participating in a surgical task sharing training programme were compared with hospital records (HRs). The logbook entries were categorized as matching, close matching or over-reported. Moreover, HRs were checked for under-reported procedures. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the study participants on logbook recording routines. The results were analysed using mixed effects logistic regression models. Results Three thousand one hundred sixty-nine database entries from 35 participants were analysed. Of that amount, 62.2% of the entries matched the HRs, 10.4% were close matches and 26.9% were over-reported. 20.7% of the investigated HRs were under-reported. Conclusions Information gathered from surgical logbook systems must be applied with care, and great efforts must be made to ensure that the logbook systems used provide reliable data. Based on analysis of the logbook data and interviews, focus areas are suggested to ensure reliable logbook data in LICs. Clear instructions and proper training should be provided when introducing the logbook system to the users. The importance of logging all procedures, including minor ones, should be emphasized. The logbook system should be user friendly and only as extensive as necessary. Lastly, keeping the logbooks exclusively digital is recommended, combined with sufficient IT equipment and training.
topic Training
Education
Global surgery
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1647-2
work_keys_str_mv AT øvsvendsen evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
AT chelgerud evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
AT ajvanduinen evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
AT øsalvesen evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
AT pmgeorge evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
AT habolkan evaluationofasurgicaltasksharingtrainingprogrammeslogbooksysteminsierraleone
_version_ 1724489581326237696