Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method

Introduction. Various mobile devices are used in the therapy of unilateral free-end saddle. Unilateral dentures with precise connectivity elements are not used frequently. In this paper the problem of applying and functionality of unilateral freeend saddle denture without major connector was take...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Radović Katarina, Čairović Aleksandra, Todorović Aleksandar, Stančić Ivica, Grbović Aleksandar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Medical Society 2010-01-01
Series:Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791012706R.pdf
id doaj-c753a5b577d1428da146ce227a37f535
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c753a5b577d1428da146ce227a37f5352021-01-02T00:50:45ZengSerbian Medical SocietySrpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo0370-81792010-01-0113811-1270671310.2298/SARH1012706RComparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element methodRadović KatarinaČairović AleksandraTodorović AleksandarStančić IvicaGrbović AleksandarIntroduction. Various mobile devices are used in the therapy of unilateral free-end saddle. Unilateral dentures with precise connectivity elements are not used frequently. In this paper the problem of applying and functionality of unilateral freeend saddle denture without major connector was taken into consideration. Objective. The aim was to analyze and compare a unilateral RPD (removable partial denture) and a classical RPD by calculating and analyzing stresses under different loads. Methods. 3D models of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture with casted clasps were made by using computer program CATIA V5 (abutment teeth, canine and first premolar, with crowns and abutment tissues were also made). The models were built in full-scale. Stress analyses for both models were performed by applying a force of 300 N on the second premolar, a force of 500 N on the first molar and a force of 700 N on the second molar. Results. The Fault Model Extractor (FME) analysis and calculation showed the complete behavior of unilateral removable partial denture and abutments (canine and first premolar), as well as the behavior of RPD under identical loading conditions. Applied forces with extreme values caused high stress levels on both models and their abutments within physiological limits. Conclusion. Having analyzed stresses under same conditions, we concluded that the unilateral RPD and classical RPD have similar physiological values. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791012706R.pdfunilateral free-end denturefinite element methodstress distribution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radović Katarina
Čairović Aleksandra
Todorović Aleksandar
Stančić Ivica
Grbović Aleksandar
spellingShingle Radović Katarina
Čairović Aleksandra
Todorović Aleksandar
Stančić Ivica
Grbović Aleksandar
Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
unilateral free-end denture
finite element method
stress distribution
author_facet Radović Katarina
Čairović Aleksandra
Todorović Aleksandar
Stančić Ivica
Grbović Aleksandar
author_sort Radović Katarina
title Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
title_short Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
title_full Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
title_sort comparative analysis of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture by using finite element method
publisher Serbian Medical Society
series Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
issn 0370-8179
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Introduction. Various mobile devices are used in the therapy of unilateral free-end saddle. Unilateral dentures with precise connectivity elements are not used frequently. In this paper the problem of applying and functionality of unilateral freeend saddle denture without major connector was taken into consideration. Objective. The aim was to analyze and compare a unilateral RPD (removable partial denture) and a classical RPD by calculating and analyzing stresses under different loads. Methods. 3D models of unilateral removable partial denture and classical removable partial denture with casted clasps were made by using computer program CATIA V5 (abutment teeth, canine and first premolar, with crowns and abutment tissues were also made). The models were built in full-scale. Stress analyses for both models were performed by applying a force of 300 N on the second premolar, a force of 500 N on the first molar and a force of 700 N on the second molar. Results. The Fault Model Extractor (FME) analysis and calculation showed the complete behavior of unilateral removable partial denture and abutments (canine and first premolar), as well as the behavior of RPD under identical loading conditions. Applied forces with extreme values caused high stress levels on both models and their abutments within physiological limits. Conclusion. Having analyzed stresses under same conditions, we concluded that the unilateral RPD and classical RPD have similar physiological values.
topic unilateral free-end denture
finite element method
stress distribution
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791012706R.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT radovickatarina comparativeanalysisofunilateralremovablepartialdentureandclassicalremovablepartialdenturebyusingfiniteelementmethod
AT cairovicaleksandra comparativeanalysisofunilateralremovablepartialdentureandclassicalremovablepartialdenturebyusingfiniteelementmethod
AT todorovicaleksandar comparativeanalysisofunilateralremovablepartialdentureandclassicalremovablepartialdenturebyusingfiniteelementmethod
AT stancicivica comparativeanalysisofunilateralremovablepartialdentureandclassicalremovablepartialdenturebyusingfiniteelementmethod
AT grbovicaleksandar comparativeanalysisofunilateralremovablepartialdentureandclassicalremovablepartialdenturebyusingfiniteelementmethod
_version_ 1724363483071381504