Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism
Theorists of post capitalism have recently argued for a more or less inevitable end to capitalism. They assume that private accumulation is systematically blocked by the inability of capitalist corporations to create revenues by setting prices as they lose control over the reproduction of their comm...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
tripleC
2016-11-01
|
Series: | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/755 |
id |
doaj-c73bf5dacfd84a07a52c5416aafc1cd2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c73bf5dacfd84a07a52c5416aafc1cd22020-11-25T00:10:55ZengtripleCtripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique1726-670X1726-670X2016-11-01142457–474457–47410.31269/triplec.v14i2.755755Market and Labour Control in Digital CapitalismPhilipp Staab0Oliver Nachtwey1Hamburger Institut für SozialforschungTU DarmstadtTheorists of post capitalism have recently argued for a more or less inevitable end to capitalism. They assume that private accumulation is systematically blocked by the inability of capitalist corporations to create revenues by setting prices as they lose control over the reproduction of their commodities and that in this process, capitalist labour will eventually disappear. Drawing on a case study of Amazon and thoughts on the policies of other leading digital corporations, we challenge these assumptions. Key corporate players of digitization are trying to become powerful monopolies and have partly succeeded in doing so, using the network effects and scaling opportunities of digital goods and building socio-technical ecosystems. These strategies have led to the development of in part isomorphic structures, hence creating a situation of oligopolistic market competition. We draw on basic assumptions of monopoly capital theory to argue that in this situation labour process rationalization becomes key to the corporation’s competitive strategies. We see the expansion of digital control and the organizational structures applied by key corporate players of the digital economy as evidence for the expansion of capitalist labour, not its reduction.https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/755Digitalizationcapitalismdigital workdigital economyamazongooglemarketcontrolorganization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Philipp Staab Oliver Nachtwey |
spellingShingle |
Philipp Staab Oliver Nachtwey Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique Digitalization capitalism digital work digital economy amazon market control organization |
author_facet |
Philipp Staab Oliver Nachtwey |
author_sort |
Philipp Staab |
title |
Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism |
title_short |
Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism |
title_full |
Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism |
title_fullStr |
Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Market and Labour Control in Digital Capitalism |
title_sort |
market and labour control in digital capitalism |
publisher |
tripleC |
series |
tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique |
issn |
1726-670X 1726-670X |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
Theorists of post capitalism have recently argued for a more or less inevitable end to capitalism. They assume that private accumulation is systematically blocked by the inability of capitalist corporations to create revenues by setting prices as they lose control over the reproduction of their commodities and that in this process, capitalist labour will eventually disappear. Drawing on a case study of Amazon and thoughts on the policies of other leading digital corporations, we challenge these assumptions. Key corporate players of digitization are trying to become powerful monopolies and have partly succeeded in doing so, using the network effects and scaling opportunities of digital goods and building socio-technical ecosystems. These strategies have led to the development of in part isomorphic structures, hence creating a situation of oligopolistic market competition. We draw on basic assumptions of monopoly capital theory to argue that in this situation labour process rationalization becomes key to the corporation’s competitive strategies. We see the expansion of digital control and the organizational structures applied by key corporate players of the digital economy as evidence for the expansion of capitalist labour, not its reduction. |
topic |
Digitalization capitalism digital work digital economy amazon market control organization |
url |
https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/755 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT philippstaab marketandlabourcontrolindigitalcapitalism AT olivernachtwey marketandlabourcontrolindigitalcapitalism |
_version_ |
1725406293086175232 |