Comparing the American and South Korean testing approaches for controlling the spread of COVID-19

• Main Author: Francis M. Malwal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: South Sudan Doctors' Association 2020-05-01
• Series: South Sudan Medical Journal
• Subjects: usa; south korea; testing; coronavirus; covid-19
• Online Access: https://bit.ly/34fR0ja

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a novel coronavirus. The outbreak started in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and began to spread rapidly to more than 100 countries and territories. By March 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Objective: To review the effectiveness of American and South Koren testing approaches of the COVID-19 plan. Method: Daily reports of the USA and South Korea COVID-19 cases from February 15 to April 15, 2020 were examined. The outcome of interest was total number of cases and tests per 1 million population, daily cases reported, and percent of recovered cases and case fatality rate (CFR). Data were analysed using Microsoft excel 2010 excel sheet and tables and figures generated. Result: As of April 15 2020, USA’s and South Korea's number of cases per million population are 1,946 and 207 cases, respectively. The daily USA’s confirmed cases of COVID-19 had been increasing steadily from February 15 to April 15, 2020. Our study shows that South Korea and the USA recovered cases were 97% and 63%, respectively, while the case fatality rate in the USA was 37 % and 3% in South Korea. Conclusion: Despite its advanced health care systems, the USA is currently experiencing a devastating virus that has claimed many lives. This is because the USA has approached the outbreak differently. The evidence suggests that South Korea's aggressive testing has effectively managed to control the spread of COVID-19, it increased the recovered rate and reduced the CFR more than the USA conservative testing approach. Although the South Korea health care system is not comparable to those in the developing countries, it worth mentioning that its plan would suit well these countries and should be adopted.