Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study

Objectives: To comparatively evaluate the efficiency of various chemomechanical caries removal agents in smear layer removal. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 45 extracted, noncarious molars and were divided into three groups according to the chemical tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rani Somani, Shipra Jaidka, Deepti Jawa, Shreya Mishra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=3;spage=204;epage=207;aulast=Somani
id doaj-c7356838139549a886f22884e1089e50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7356838139549a886f22884e1089e502020-11-24T22:31:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052015-01-0133320420710.4103/0970-4388.160358Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM studyRani SomaniShipra JaidkaDeepti JawaShreya MishraObjectives: To comparatively evaluate the efficiency of various chemomechanical caries removal agents in smear layer removal. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 45 extracted, noncarious molars and were divided into three groups according to the chemical treatment received. The samples were then gold palladium coated and viewed under scanning electron microscope. The presence of smear layer was evaluated based on the microscopic observations. Result and Observation: The results indicated that smear layer removal was significantly higher in the sodium hypochlorite-based chemomechanical caries removal agents than in the papain-based chemomechanical caries removal agent and was least in the control group treated with saline. Conclusion: The smear layer removal was maximum with Carisolv followed by the cariecare and was minimum in the saline-treated group.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=3;spage=204;epage=207;aulast=SomaniCavity conditionerschemomechanical caries removal agentssmear layer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rani Somani
Shipra Jaidka
Deepti Jawa
Shreya Mishra
spellingShingle Rani Somani
Shipra Jaidka
Deepti Jawa
Shreya Mishra
Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Cavity conditioners
chemomechanical caries removal agents
smear layer
author_facet Rani Somani
Shipra Jaidka
Deepti Jawa
Shreya Mishra
author_sort Rani Somani
title Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
title_short Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
title_full Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: An in vitro SEM study
title_sort comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by various chemomechanical caries removal agents: an in vitro sem study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
issn 0970-4388
1998-3905
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objectives: To comparatively evaluate the efficiency of various chemomechanical caries removal agents in smear layer removal. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 45 extracted, noncarious molars and were divided into three groups according to the chemical treatment received. The samples were then gold palladium coated and viewed under scanning electron microscope. The presence of smear layer was evaluated based on the microscopic observations. Result and Observation: The results indicated that smear layer removal was significantly higher in the sodium hypochlorite-based chemomechanical caries removal agents than in the papain-based chemomechanical caries removal agent and was least in the control group treated with saline. Conclusion: The smear layer removal was maximum with Carisolv followed by the cariecare and was minimum in the saline-treated group.
topic Cavity conditioners
chemomechanical caries removal agents
smear layer
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2015;volume=33;issue=3;spage=204;epage=207;aulast=Somani
work_keys_str_mv AT ranisomani comparativeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalbyvariouschemomechanicalcariesremovalagentsaninvitrosemstudy
AT shiprajaidka comparativeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalbyvariouschemomechanicalcariesremovalagentsaninvitrosemstudy
AT deeptijawa comparativeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalbyvariouschemomechanicalcariesremovalagentsaninvitrosemstudy
AT shreyamishra comparativeevaluationofsmearlayerremovalbyvariouschemomechanicalcariesremovalagentsaninvitrosemstudy
_version_ 1725736727230808064