Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work

Since the mid-2000s, critical commentators have raised concerns about both the paucity of evidence on important aspects of human trafficking, and the difficulty of obtaining meaningful data. Policy formations, advocacy campaigns, concrete interventions, and popular understandings of human traffickin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sallie Yea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women 2017-04-01
Series:Anti-Trafficking Review
Online Access:http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/223
id doaj-c7193782831a45b5b95506a94e4c39d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7193782831a45b5b95506a94e4c39d92020-11-24T21:07:16ZengGlobal Alliance Against Traffic in WomenAnti-Trafficking Review2286-75112287-01132017-04-01810.14197/atr.20121781223Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking workSallie YeaSince the mid-2000s, critical commentators have raised concerns about both the paucity of evidence on important aspects of human trafficking, and the difficulty of obtaining meaningful data. Policy formations, advocacy campaigns, concrete interventions, and popular understandings of human trafficking have all had accusations of wild claims and unfounded assumptions levelled at them. Guesstimates prevail and take on a life of their own in such a context. Calls for more robust evidence to prove or disprove claims about the nature, extent and location of human trafficking, the characteristics of trafficked persons, and the continued investment in particular types of responses have abounded. This has occurred in light of the growing potential for unsubstantiated claims to fulfil the place of rigorous evidence to inform anti-trafficking work.http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/223
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sallie Yea
spellingShingle Sallie Yea
Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
Anti-Trafficking Review
author_facet Sallie Yea
author_sort Sallie Yea
title Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
title_short Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
title_full Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
title_fullStr Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
title_full_unstemmed Editorial: The politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
title_sort editorial: the politics of evidence, data and research in anti-trafficking work
publisher Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
series Anti-Trafficking Review
issn 2286-7511
2287-0113
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Since the mid-2000s, critical commentators have raised concerns about both the paucity of evidence on important aspects of human trafficking, and the difficulty of obtaining meaningful data. Policy formations, advocacy campaigns, concrete interventions, and popular understandings of human trafficking have all had accusations of wild claims and unfounded assumptions levelled at them. Guesstimates prevail and take on a life of their own in such a context. Calls for more robust evidence to prove or disprove claims about the nature, extent and location of human trafficking, the characteristics of trafficked persons, and the continued investment in particular types of responses have abounded. This has occurred in light of the growing potential for unsubstantiated claims to fulfil the place of rigorous evidence to inform anti-trafficking work.
url http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/223
work_keys_str_mv AT sallieyea editorialthepoliticsofevidencedataandresearchinantitraffickingwork
_version_ 1716763619017883648