Multi-criteria parameter estimation for the Unified Land Model

• Main Authors: B. Livneh, D. P. Lettenmaier
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-08-01
• Series: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
• Online Access: http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3029/2012/hess-16-3029-2012.pdf
• ISSN: 1027-5606; 1607-7938

We describe a parameter estimation framework for the Unified Land Model (ULM) that utilizes multiple independent data sets over the continental United States. These include a satellite-based evapotranspiration (ET) product based on MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) imagery, an atmospheric-water balance based ET estimate that utilizes North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) atmospheric fields, terrestrial water storage content (TWSC) data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), and streamflow (<i>Q</i>) primarily from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauges. The study domain includes 10 large-scale (≥10<sup>5</sup> km<sup>2</sup>) river basins and 250 smaller-scale (<10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>) tributary basins. ULM, which is essentially a merger of the Noah Land Surface Model and Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model, is the basis for these experiments. Calibrations were made using each of the data sets individually, in addition to combinations of multiple criteria, with multi-criteria skill scores computed for all cases. At large scales, calibration to <i>Q</i> resulted in the best overall performance, whereas certain combinations of ET and TWSC calibrations lead to large errors in other criteria. At small scales, about one-third of the basins had their highest <i>Q</i> performance from multi-criteria calibrations (to <i>Q</i> and ET) suggesting that traditional calibration to <i>Q</i> may benefit by supplementing observed <i>Q</i> with remote sensing estimates of ET. Model streamflow errors using optimized parameters were mostly due to over (under) estimation of low (high) flows. Overall, uncertainties in remote-sensing data proved to be a limiting factor in the utility of multi-criteria parameter estimation.