Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating

Abstract In this study, an induction heating (IH) application is carried out by transferring the maximum power extracted from photovoltaic (PV) panels to the stainless steel with the designed regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation (PDM) controlled series resonant inverter. The main object...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akif Karafil, Harun Ozbay, Selim Oncu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:IET Power Electronics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.12012
id doaj-c70b3b3cda92448cb69c589f97f4df73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c70b3b3cda92448cb69c589f97f4df732021-08-02T08:30:09ZengWileyIET Power Electronics1755-45351755-45432021-01-01141788910.1049/pel2.12012Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heatingAkif Karafil0Harun Ozbay1Selim Oncu2Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Yalova University Yalova TurkeyDepartment of Electrical Engineering Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University Balikesir TurkeyDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Karabuk University Karabuk TurkeyAbstract In this study, an induction heating (IH) application is carried out by transferring the maximum power extracted from photovoltaic (PV) panels to the stainless steel with the designed regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation (PDM) controlled series resonant inverter. The main objective of this study is to analyse the changes in the system due to regular and irregular PDM patterns. Maximum power point tracker (MPPT) is used to control the output power at different solar irradiation values with varying PDM patterns. Regular and irregular PDM control methods are compared in terms of MPPT efficiency, cost, algorithm complexity, logic control structure and current/voltage stresses of the power switches. Zero current switching (ZCS) conditions are provided by using phase locked loop (PLL) technique at all power points of the PV system. The appropriate switching conditions are tracked continuously at resonant frequency, and therefore soft switching is realised. Perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm is used with the aim of tracking the maximum power in PV panels and high tracking efficiency is obtained with PDM‐controlled P&O MPPT algorithm. ATMEL328P‐AU microcontroller is used to control the inverter in the system.https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.12012
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akif Karafil
Harun Ozbay
Selim Oncu
spellingShingle Akif Karafil
Harun Ozbay
Selim Oncu
Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
IET Power Electronics
author_facet Akif Karafil
Harun Ozbay
Selim Oncu
author_sort Akif Karafil
title Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
title_short Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
title_full Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
title_fullStr Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
title_sort comparison of regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation patterns for induction heating
publisher Wiley
series IET Power Electronics
issn 1755-4535
1755-4543
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract In this study, an induction heating (IH) application is carried out by transferring the maximum power extracted from photovoltaic (PV) panels to the stainless steel with the designed regular and irregular 32 pulse density modulation (PDM) controlled series resonant inverter. The main objective of this study is to analyse the changes in the system due to regular and irregular PDM patterns. Maximum power point tracker (MPPT) is used to control the output power at different solar irradiation values with varying PDM patterns. Regular and irregular PDM control methods are compared in terms of MPPT efficiency, cost, algorithm complexity, logic control structure and current/voltage stresses of the power switches. Zero current switching (ZCS) conditions are provided by using phase locked loop (PLL) technique at all power points of the PV system. The appropriate switching conditions are tracked continuously at resonant frequency, and therefore soft switching is realised. Perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm is used with the aim of tracking the maximum power in PV panels and high tracking efficiency is obtained with PDM‐controlled P&O MPPT algorithm. ATMEL328P‐AU microcontroller is used to control the inverter in the system.
url https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.12012
work_keys_str_mv AT akifkarafil comparisonofregularandirregular32pulsedensitymodulationpatternsforinductionheating
AT harunozbay comparisonofregularandirregular32pulsedensitymodulationpatternsforinductionheating
AT selimoncu comparisonofregularandirregular32pulsedensitymodulationpatternsforinductionheating
_version_ 1721238194697011200