Gajo Petrović’s Praxis

The author’s approach is based on three premises: 1. that Gajo Petrović’s Praxis was an outstanding phenomenon in Croatian, Yugoslav and European culture, a challenge of freedom in a repressive society; 2. that there has never been such a thing as "Praxis group", "philosophers of prac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jakšić Božidar
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2007-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380702073J.pdf
id doaj-c70600d21d6b4ba98beef48cb73b2116
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c70600d21d6b4ba98beef48cb73b21162020-11-24T23:17:12ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382007-01-01182739810.2298/FID0702073JGajo Petrović’s PraxisJakšić BožidarThe author’s approach is based on three premises: 1. that Gajo Petrović’s Praxis was an outstanding phenomenon in Croatian, Yugoslav and European culture, a challenge of freedom in a repressive society; 2. that there has never been such a thing as "Praxis group", "philosophers of practice" or "Praxis philosophers" with a unified philosophical and socio-theoretical orientation; and 3. that political and ideological attacks on Praxis were part of the repressive system that targeted every instance of cultural and scientific dissent. The political leadership of Tito’s regime, its ideological and propaganda apparatus systematically disseminated allegations, denunciations and accusations against Praxis and Gajo Petrović. The same style has survived through radical historical changes from the appearance of Praxis until today. The attackers have often been the same persons, with the difference that in earlier times they denounced Praxis and Gajo Petrović as enemies of "socialism" and the "socialist self-management system", and in the changed political fashion as "servants" of Tito’s authoritarian rule. The fate of Praxis in the former regime has been triumphantly interpreted as a "family quarrel". This paper attempts a sociological analysis of the political destiny of Praxis. The analysis is essentially determined not by old and new political and ideological questionings of Praxis, but by Gajo Petrović’s fundamental belief that there is no freedom without the human or humanity without freedom. . http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380702073J.pdfPraxisthe Korčula Summer Schoolcritical thoughtfreedom
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakšić Božidar
spellingShingle Jakšić Božidar
Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
Filozofija i Društvo
Praxis
the Korčula Summer School
critical thought
freedom
author_facet Jakšić Božidar
author_sort Jakšić Božidar
title Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
title_short Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
title_full Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
title_fullStr Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
title_full_unstemmed Gajo Petrović’s Praxis
title_sort gajo petrović’s praxis
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
series Filozofija i Društvo
issn 0353-5738
publishDate 2007-01-01
description The author’s approach is based on three premises: 1. that Gajo Petrović’s Praxis was an outstanding phenomenon in Croatian, Yugoslav and European culture, a challenge of freedom in a repressive society; 2. that there has never been such a thing as "Praxis group", "philosophers of practice" or "Praxis philosophers" with a unified philosophical and socio-theoretical orientation; and 3. that political and ideological attacks on Praxis were part of the repressive system that targeted every instance of cultural and scientific dissent. The political leadership of Tito’s regime, its ideological and propaganda apparatus systematically disseminated allegations, denunciations and accusations against Praxis and Gajo Petrović. The same style has survived through radical historical changes from the appearance of Praxis until today. The attackers have often been the same persons, with the difference that in earlier times they denounced Praxis and Gajo Petrović as enemies of "socialism" and the "socialist self-management system", and in the changed political fashion as "servants" of Tito’s authoritarian rule. The fate of Praxis in the former regime has been triumphantly interpreted as a "family quarrel". This paper attempts a sociological analysis of the political destiny of Praxis. The analysis is essentially determined not by old and new political and ideological questionings of Praxis, but by Gajo Petrović’s fundamental belief that there is no freedom without the human or humanity without freedom. .
topic Praxis
the Korčula Summer School
critical thought
freedom
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2007/0353-57380702073J.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaksicbozidar gajopetrovicspraxis
_version_ 1725584361112207360