Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
This article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107 |
id |
doaj-c702f5ad7fb143eda9312f7b686430f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c702f5ad7fb143eda9312f7b686430f12020-11-24T21:43:00ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332016-02-0148116917410.1016/j.net.2015.08.010Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel CycleMichal KovacThis article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculations. The second part is the business–economic evaluation of the selected reloading strategy, which can be done either by financial analysis or economic analysis. The financial analysis incorporates the perspectives of a company while the economic analysis can be used primarily by national economists or politicians. This methodology was applied to a case study that is focused on impacts of switching from a 12-month to an 18-month fuel cycle strategy for Water-Water Energetic Reactor (VVER)-1000 reactors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107Core designCost-benefit analysisEconomics of nuclear fuel cyclesFuel cycle strategy18-Month fuel cycle |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michal Kovac |
spellingShingle |
Michal Kovac Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Nuclear Engineering and Technology Core design Cost-benefit analysis Economics of nuclear fuel cycles Fuel cycle strategy 18-Month fuel cycle |
author_facet |
Michal Kovac |
author_sort |
Michal Kovac |
title |
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle |
title_sort |
evaluation of the middle part of the nuclear fuel cycle |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
issn |
1738-5733 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
This article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculations. The second part is the business–economic evaluation of the selected reloading strategy, which can be done either by financial analysis or economic analysis. The financial analysis incorporates the perspectives of a company while the economic analysis can be used primarily by national economists or politicians. This methodology was applied to a case study that is focused on impacts of switching from a 12-month to an 18-month fuel cycle strategy for Water-Water Energetic Reactor (VVER)-1000 reactors. |
topic |
Core design Cost-benefit analysis Economics of nuclear fuel cycles Fuel cycle strategy 18-Month fuel cycle |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michalkovac evaluationofthemiddlepartofthenuclearfuelcycle |
_version_ |
1725915896091770880 |