Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

This article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michal Kovac
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-02-01
Series:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107
id doaj-c702f5ad7fb143eda9312f7b686430f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c702f5ad7fb143eda9312f7b686430f12020-11-24T21:43:00ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332016-02-0148116917410.1016/j.net.2015.08.010Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel CycleMichal KovacThis article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculations. The second part is the business–economic evaluation of the selected reloading strategy, which can be done either by financial analysis or economic analysis. The financial analysis incorporates the perspectives of a company while the economic analysis can be used primarily by national economists or politicians. This methodology was applied to a case study that is focused on impacts of switching from a 12-month to an 18-month fuel cycle strategy for Water-Water Energetic Reactor (VVER)-1000 reactors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107Core designCost-benefit analysisEconomics of nuclear fuel cyclesFuel cycle strategy18-Month fuel cycle
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michal Kovac
spellingShingle Michal Kovac
Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Core design
Cost-benefit analysis
Economics of nuclear fuel cycles
Fuel cycle strategy
18-Month fuel cycle
author_facet Michal Kovac
author_sort Michal Kovac
title Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
title_short Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
title_full Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Middle Part of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
title_sort evaluation of the middle part of the nuclear fuel cycle
publisher Elsevier
series Nuclear Engineering and Technology
issn 1738-5733
publishDate 2016-02-01
description This article describes a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of the middle part of nuclear fuel cycles. Evaluation of fuel cycles is basically divided into two parts. The first comprises nuclear calculation, i.e., creation of the strategy for nuclear fuel reloading and core design calculations. The second part is the business–economic evaluation of the selected reloading strategy, which can be done either by financial analysis or economic analysis. The financial analysis incorporates the perspectives of a company while the economic analysis can be used primarily by national economists or politicians. This methodology was applied to a case study that is focused on impacts of switching from a 12-month to an 18-month fuel cycle strategy for Water-Water Energetic Reactor (VVER)-1000 reactors.
topic Core design
Cost-benefit analysis
Economics of nuclear fuel cycles
Fuel cycle strategy
18-Month fuel cycle
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315002107
work_keys_str_mv AT michalkovac evaluationofthemiddlepartofthenuclearfuelcycle
_version_ 1725915896091770880