Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution

The judgment competent reasoners exhibit in deciding when reasoning should not be used to resolve disagreements is eroded by adopting the popular strategy of ascending to higher levels of generality. That strategy encourages disputants to believeoften incorrectly-that they stand on some common groun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Campolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2005-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/1043
id doaj-c6fbe799ddd941358add44e5a5ffb1e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6fbe799ddd941358add44e5a5ffb1e72020-11-25T02:07:51ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2005-01-0125110.22329/il.v25i1.1043Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict ResolutionChristian CampoloThe judgment competent reasoners exhibit in deciding when reasoning should not be used to resolve disagreements is eroded by adopting the popular strategy of ascending to higher levels of generality. That strategy encourages disputants to believeoften incorrectly-that they stand on some common ground that can be exploited to reach agreement. But if we regularly assume that we share values and interests with our opponents in seemingly intractable disputes, we risk losing the ability to judge whether or not we share enough. And when we lose track of the difference between promising and unpromising conditions for reasoning, we end up trying to reason at the wrong times. Such reasoning can in turn seriously damage our reasoning skills themselves.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/1043
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Campolo
spellingShingle Christian Campolo
Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
Informal Logic
author_facet Christian Campolo
author_sort Christian Campolo
title Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
title_short Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
title_full Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
title_fullStr Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution
title_sort treacherous ascents: on seeking common ground for conflict resolution
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The judgment competent reasoners exhibit in deciding when reasoning should not be used to resolve disagreements is eroded by adopting the popular strategy of ascending to higher levels of generality. That strategy encourages disputants to believeoften incorrectly-that they stand on some common ground that can be exploited to reach agreement. But if we regularly assume that we share values and interests with our opponents in seemingly intractable disputes, we risk losing the ability to judge whether or not we share enough. And when we lose track of the difference between promising and unpromising conditions for reasoning, we end up trying to reason at the wrong times. Such reasoning can in turn seriously damage our reasoning skills themselves.
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/1043
work_keys_str_mv AT christiancampolo treacherousascentsonseekingcommongroundforconflictresolution
_version_ 1724929241770885120