Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning

The author raises the issue of improving the public hearing procedure. The author analyses the established practice of public hearings in Russia, criticizes the new Urban Planning Code adopted in the Russian Federation, and expresses her concerns about the violation of its provisions regulating publ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ivanova Zinaida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/61/e3sconf_itese18_03012.pdf
id doaj-c6f6b518e7f740d5bfe9fb66e005ee9c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6f6b518e7f740d5bfe9fb66e005ee9c2021-02-02T07:31:47ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-011350301210.1051/e3sconf/201913503012e3sconf_itese18_03012Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planningIvanova Zinaida0Moscow State University of Civil EngineeringThe author raises the issue of improving the public hearing procedure. The author analyses the established practice of public hearings in Russia, criticizes the new Urban Planning Code adopted in the Russian Federation, and expresses her concerns about the violation of its provisions regulating public hearings and discussions. These concerns are the outcome of an extensive in-depth research into the practice of public hearings, the analysis of their minutes and resolutions; the process of monitoring the course of public hearings, and sociological surveys launched among different categories of respondents in Moscow. The author analyzes the findings of the polls launched among Muscovites, as well as the expert interviews given by the deputies of the Moscow State Duma and members of urban initiative groups. The author’s conclusion is that the conversion of public hearings into an efficient public and political institute requires the reconsideration of their organization and implementation processes, let alone the assignment of a legal status to resolutions of public hearings. The author proposes a two-step public hearing model that will make it possible to expose projects to thorough expert evaluations by independent specialists and to launch extensive discussions among urban residents.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/61/e3sconf_itese18_03012.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivanova Zinaida
spellingShingle Ivanova Zinaida
Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Ivanova Zinaida
author_sort Ivanova Zinaida
title Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
title_short Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
title_full Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
title_fullStr Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
title_full_unstemmed Theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
title_sort theory and practice of public hearings in urban planning
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The author raises the issue of improving the public hearing procedure. The author analyses the established practice of public hearings in Russia, criticizes the new Urban Planning Code adopted in the Russian Federation, and expresses her concerns about the violation of its provisions regulating public hearings and discussions. These concerns are the outcome of an extensive in-depth research into the practice of public hearings, the analysis of their minutes and resolutions; the process of monitoring the course of public hearings, and sociological surveys launched among different categories of respondents in Moscow. The author analyzes the findings of the polls launched among Muscovites, as well as the expert interviews given by the deputies of the Moscow State Duma and members of urban initiative groups. The author’s conclusion is that the conversion of public hearings into an efficient public and political institute requires the reconsideration of their organization and implementation processes, let alone the assignment of a legal status to resolutions of public hearings. The author proposes a two-step public hearing model that will make it possible to expose projects to thorough expert evaluations by independent specialists and to launch extensive discussions among urban residents.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/61/e3sconf_itese18_03012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanovazinaida theoryandpracticeofpublichearingsinurbanplanning
_version_ 1724299273305063424