Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?

Abstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milena Piotrowska, Francesco Giacosa, Peter Kovacs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-01-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9
id doaj-c6d67e9e8a4c4c159c2646b9be9c1c90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6d67e9e8a4c4c159c2646b9be9c1c902020-11-25T00:29:22ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522019-01-0179211210.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?Milena Piotrowska0Francesco Giacosa1Peter Kovacs2Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski UniversityInstitute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski UniversityWigner Research Centre for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Hungarian Academy of SciencesAbstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$ Ds∗Ds are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit–Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops, occurs); moreover, besides the $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ pole of $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , a second dynamically generated broad pole at 4 GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Y(4008). Yet, this state was not seen in the reaction $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}$$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗ , but in processes with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at 4 GeV in the process $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}\rightarrow \pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗→π+π-J/ψ appears when $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops are considered. Its existence in this reaction is not necessarily connected to the existence of a dynamically generated pole, but the underlying mechanism – the strong coupling of $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ to $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops – can generate both of them. Thus, the controversial state Y(4008) may not be a genuine resonance, but a peak generated by the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) and $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D loops with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milena Piotrowska
Francesco Giacosa
Peter Kovacs
spellingShingle Milena Piotrowska
Francesco Giacosa
Peter Kovacs
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
author_facet Milena Piotrowska
Francesco Giacosa
Peter Kovacs
author_sort Milena Piotrowska
title Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
title_short Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
title_full Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
title_fullStr Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
title_full_unstemmed Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
title_sort can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with y(4008)?
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
issn 1434-6044
1434-6052
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$ Ds∗Ds are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit–Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops, occurs); moreover, besides the $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ pole of $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , a second dynamically generated broad pole at 4 GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Y(4008). Yet, this state was not seen in the reaction $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}$$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗ , but in processes with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at 4 GeV in the process $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}\rightarrow \pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗→π+π-J/ψ appears when $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops are considered. Its existence in this reaction is not necessarily connected to the existence of a dynamically generated pole, but the underlying mechanism – the strong coupling of $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ to $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops – can generate both of them. Thus, the controversial state Y(4008) may not be a genuine resonance, but a peak generated by the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) and $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D loops with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9
work_keys_str_mv AT milenapiotrowska canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008
AT francescogiacosa canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008
AT peterkovacs canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008
_version_ 1725331820719898624