Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?
Abstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-01-01
|
Series: | European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9 |
id |
doaj-c6d67e9e8a4c4c159c2646b9be9c1c90 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c6d67e9e8a4c4c159c2646b9be9c1c902020-11-25T00:29:22ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522019-01-0179211210.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)?Milena Piotrowska0Francesco Giacosa1Peter Kovacs2Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski UniversityInstitute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski UniversityWigner Research Centre for Physics, Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Hungarian Academy of SciencesAbstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$ Ds∗Ds are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit–Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops, occurs); moreover, besides the $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ pole of $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , a second dynamically generated broad pole at 4 GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Y(4008). Yet, this state was not seen in the reaction $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}$$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗ , but in processes with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at 4 GeV in the process $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}\rightarrow \pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗→π+π-J/ψ appears when $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops are considered. Its existence in this reaction is not necessarily connected to the existence of a dynamically generated pole, but the underlying mechanism – the strong coupling of $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ to $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops – can generate both of them. Thus, the controversial state Y(4008) may not be a genuine resonance, but a peak generated by the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) and $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D loops with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Milena Piotrowska Francesco Giacosa Peter Kovacs |
spellingShingle |
Milena Piotrowska Francesco Giacosa Peter Kovacs Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
author_facet |
Milena Piotrowska Francesco Giacosa Peter Kovacs |
author_sort |
Milena Piotrowska |
title |
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? |
title_short |
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? |
title_full |
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? |
title_fullStr |
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? |
title_sort |
can the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with y(4008)? |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
issn |
1434-6044 1434-6052 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Abstract We study the well-known resonance $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , corresponding to a $$3^{3}S_{1}$$ 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state $$\psi (3S)$$ ψ(3S) , within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D , $$D^{*}D^{*}$$ D∗D∗ , $$D_{s}D_{s}$$ DsDs and $$D_{s}^{*}D_{s}$$ Ds∗Ds are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit–Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops, occurs); moreover, besides the $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ pole of $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) , a second dynamically generated broad pole at 4 GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Y(4008). Yet, this state was not seen in the reaction $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}$$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗ , but in processes with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at 4 GeV in the process $$e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \psi (4040)\rightarrow DD^{*}\rightarrow \pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ e+e-→ψ(4040)→DD∗→π+π-J/ψ appears when $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops are considered. Its existence in this reaction is not necessarily connected to the existence of a dynamically generated pole, but the underlying mechanism – the strong coupling of $$c{\bar{c}}$$ cc¯ to $$DD^{*}$$ DD∗ loops – can generate both of them. Thus, the controversial state Y(4008) may not be a genuine resonance, but a peak generated by the $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ(4040) and $$D^{*}D$$ D∗D loops with $$\pi ^{+}\pi ^{-}J/\psi $$ π+π-J/ψ in the final state. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6615-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT milenapiotrowska canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008 AT francescogiacosa canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008 AT peterkovacs canthepsi4040ps4040explainthepeakassociatedwithy4008 |
_version_ |
1725331820719898624 |