Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
Abstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by an...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Nursing Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829 |
id |
doaj-c6d4c1a2b1b0475ab7b46a8136f42c49 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c6d4c1a2b1b0475ab7b46a8136f42c492021-08-13T22:37:04ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-09-01852272228310.1002/nop2.829Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomiesAlexandra González Aguña0Marta Fernández Batalla1Enrique Monsalvo San Macario2Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo3María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez4José María Santamaría García5Research Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainEastern Area of Primary Care Community of Madrid Health Service Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainAbstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by analysis of terms into the diagnosis label and definition. Data analysis was quantitative with frequency measurements. The second phase mapped the identified diagnoses to establish equivalences using analysis by terms in the diagnostic labels. Finally, the findings obtained in the first phase were compared with the OMAHA System. Results The bibliographic search identified 112 studies and 16 standardized languages for diagnoses. NANDA‐I and ICNP were the most frequent taxonomies; ATIC, the most recent; and OMAHA, the oldest. 2,062 diagnoses from four diagnostic taxonomies were analysed, and 361 associations corresponding to 352 environmental diagnoses were identified. All taxonomies included the environment but with different weight relative to the interpersonal and geopolitical category.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829DiagnosisEnvironmentNursingRiskStandardized Nursing Terminology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexandra González Aguña Marta Fernández Batalla Enrique Monsalvo San Macario Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez José María Santamaría García |
spellingShingle |
Alexandra González Aguña Marta Fernández Batalla Enrique Monsalvo San Macario Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez José María Santamaría García Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies Nursing Open Diagnosis Environment Nursing Risk Standardized Nursing Terminology |
author_facet |
Alexandra González Aguña Marta Fernández Batalla Enrique Monsalvo San Macario Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez José María Santamaría García |
author_sort |
Alexandra González Aguña |
title |
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
title_short |
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
title_full |
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
title_sort |
diagnostics of care about environment: a systematic review through nursing taxonomies |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Nursing Open |
issn |
2054-1058 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by analysis of terms into the diagnosis label and definition. Data analysis was quantitative with frequency measurements. The second phase mapped the identified diagnoses to establish equivalences using analysis by terms in the diagnostic labels. Finally, the findings obtained in the first phase were compared with the OMAHA System. Results The bibliographic search identified 112 studies and 16 standardized languages for diagnoses. NANDA‐I and ICNP were the most frequent taxonomies; ATIC, the most recent; and OMAHA, the oldest. 2,062 diagnoses from four diagnostic taxonomies were analysed, and 361 associations corresponding to 352 environmental diagnoses were identified. All taxonomies included the environment but with different weight relative to the interpersonal and geopolitical category. |
topic |
Diagnosis Environment Nursing Risk Standardized Nursing Terminology |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandragonzalezaguna diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies AT martafernandezbatalla diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies AT enriquemonsalvosanmacario diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies AT juanantoniosarrionbravo diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies AT marialourdesjimenezrodriguez diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies AT josemariasantamariagarcia diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies |
_version_ |
1721208144406773760 |