Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies

Abstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra González Aguña, Marta Fernández Batalla, Enrique Monsalvo San Macario, Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo, María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez, José María Santamaría García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829
id doaj-c6d4c1a2b1b0475ab7b46a8136f42c49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6d4c1a2b1b0475ab7b46a8136f42c492021-08-13T22:37:04ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-09-01852272228310.1002/nop2.829Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomiesAlexandra González Aguña0Marta Fernández Batalla1Enrique Monsalvo San Macario2Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo3María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez4José María Santamaría García5Research Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainEastern Area of Primary Care Community of Madrid Health Service Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainResearch Group MISKC University of Alcalá Madrid SpainAbstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by analysis of terms into the diagnosis label and definition. Data analysis was quantitative with frequency measurements. The second phase mapped the identified diagnoses to establish equivalences using analysis by terms in the diagnostic labels. Finally, the findings obtained in the first phase were compared with the OMAHA System. Results The bibliographic search identified 112 studies and 16 standardized languages for diagnoses. NANDA‐I and ICNP were the most frequent taxonomies; ATIC, the most recent; and OMAHA, the oldest. 2,062 diagnoses from four diagnostic taxonomies were analysed, and 361 associations corresponding to 352 environmental diagnoses were identified. All taxonomies included the environment but with different weight relative to the interpersonal and geopolitical category.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829DiagnosisEnvironmentNursingRiskStandardized Nursing Terminology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandra González Aguña
Marta Fernández Batalla
Enrique Monsalvo San Macario
Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo
María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez
José María Santamaría García
spellingShingle Alexandra González Aguña
Marta Fernández Batalla
Enrique Monsalvo San Macario
Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo
María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez
José María Santamaría García
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
Nursing Open
Diagnosis
Environment
Nursing
Risk
Standardized Nursing Terminology
author_facet Alexandra González Aguña
Marta Fernández Batalla
Enrique Monsalvo San Macario
Juan Antonio Sarrión Bravo
María Lourdes Jiménez Rodríguez
José María Santamaría García
author_sort Alexandra González Aguña
title Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
title_short Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
title_full Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
title_fullStr Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies
title_sort diagnostics of care about environment: a systematic review through nursing taxonomies
publisher Wiley
series Nursing Open
issn 2054-1058
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Aim To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies. Design Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies. Methods The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by analysis of terms into the diagnosis label and definition. Data analysis was quantitative with frequency measurements. The second phase mapped the identified diagnoses to establish equivalences using analysis by terms in the diagnostic labels. Finally, the findings obtained in the first phase were compared with the OMAHA System. Results The bibliographic search identified 112 studies and 16 standardized languages for diagnoses. NANDA‐I and ICNP were the most frequent taxonomies; ATIC, the most recent; and OMAHA, the oldest. 2,062 diagnoses from four diagnostic taxonomies were analysed, and 361 associations corresponding to 352 environmental diagnoses were identified. All taxonomies included the environment but with different weight relative to the interpersonal and geopolitical category.
topic Diagnosis
Environment
Nursing
Risk
Standardized Nursing Terminology
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.829
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandragonzalezaguna diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
AT martafernandezbatalla diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
AT enriquemonsalvosanmacario diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
AT juanantoniosarrionbravo diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
AT marialourdesjimenezrodriguez diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
AT josemariasantamariagarcia diagnosticsofcareaboutenvironmentasystematicreviewthroughnursingtaxonomies
_version_ 1721208144406773760