Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
The present review focuses on the hypothesis that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are broadly distributed in areas concerned with the representation of the world and with the conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs. Both are released at times of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Neural Plasticity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191 |
id |
doaj-c6c64ce18104487985e1499bdb2afe8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c6c64ce18104487985e1499bdb2afe8a2020-11-24T23:09:58ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432004-01-01113-419120410.1155/NP.2004.191Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning SignalsCarolyn W. Harley0Psychology Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, CanadaThe present review focuses on the hypothesis that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are broadly distributed in areas concerned with the representation of the world and with the conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs. Both are released at times of novelty and uncertainty, providing plausible signal events for updating representations and associations. These catecholamines activate intracellular machinery postulated to serve as a memory-formation cascade. Yet, despite the plausibility of an NE and DA role in vertebrate learning and memory, most evidence that they provide a learning signal is circumstantial. The major weakness of the data available is the lack of a specific description of how the neural circuit modulated by NE or DA participates in the learning being analyzed. Identifying a conditioned stimuli (CS) representation would facilitate the identification of a learning signal role for NE or DA. Describing how the CS representation comes to relate to learned behavior, either through sensory-sensory associations, in which the CS acquires the motivational significance of reward or punishment, thus driving appropriate behavior, or through direct sensory-motor associations is necessary to identify how NE and DA participate in memory creation. As described here, evidence consistent with a direct learning signal role for NE and DA is seen in the changing of sensory circuits in odor preference learning (NE), defensive conditioning (NE), and auditory cortex remodeling in adult rats (DA). Evidence that NE and DA contribute to normal learning through unspecified mechanisms is extensive, but the details of that support role are lacking.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carolyn W. Harley |
spellingShingle |
Carolyn W. Harley Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals Neural Plasticity |
author_facet |
Carolyn W. Harley |
author_sort |
Carolyn W. Harley |
title |
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals |
title_short |
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals |
title_full |
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals |
title_fullStr |
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals |
title_sort |
norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Neural Plasticity |
issn |
2090-5904 1687-5443 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
The present review focuses on the hypothesis
that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA)
act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are
broadly distributed in areas concerned with the
representation of the world and with the
conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs.
Both are released at times of novelty and
uncertainty, providing plausible signal events
for updating representations and associations.
These catecholamines activate intracellular
machinery postulated to serve as a memory-formation
cascade. Yet, despite the plausibility
of an NE and DA role in vertebrate learning
and memory, most evidence that they provide a
learning signal is circumstantial. The major
weakness of the data available is the lack of a
specific description of how the neural circuit
modulated by NE or DA participates in the
learning being analyzed. Identifying a conditioned
stimuli (CS) representation would facilitate the
identification of a learning signal role for NE or
DA. Describing how the CS representation
comes to relate to learned behavior, either
through sensory-sensory associations, in which
the CS acquires the motivational significance of
reward or punishment, thus driving appropriate
behavior, or through direct sensory-motor
associations is necessary to identify how NE and DA participate in memory creation. As
described here, evidence consistent with a
direct learning signal role for NE and DA is
seen in the changing of sensory circuits in odor
preference learning (NE), defensive conditioning
(NE), and auditory cortex remodeling in adult
rats (DA). Evidence that NE and DA contribute
to normal learning through unspecified
mechanisms is extensive, but the details of that
support role are lacking. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolynwharley norepinephrineanddopamineaslearningsignals |
_version_ |
1725608845291552768 |