Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals

The present review focuses on the hypothesis that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are broadly distributed in areas concerned with the representation of the world and with the conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs. Both are released at times of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carolyn W. Harley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2004-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191
id doaj-c6c64ce18104487985e1499bdb2afe8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6c64ce18104487985e1499bdb2afe8a2020-11-24T23:09:58ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432004-01-01113-419120410.1155/NP.2004.191Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning SignalsCarolyn W. Harley0Psychology Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, CanadaThe present review focuses on the hypothesis that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are broadly distributed in areas concerned with the representation of the world and with the conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs. Both are released at times of novelty and uncertainty, providing plausible signal events for updating representations and associations. These catecholamines activate intracellular machinery postulated to serve as a memory-formation cascade. Yet, despite the plausibility of an NE and DA role in vertebrate learning and memory, most evidence that they provide a learning signal is circumstantial. The major weakness of the data available is the lack of a specific description of how the neural circuit modulated by NE or DA participates in the learning being analyzed. Identifying a conditioned stimuli (CS) representation would facilitate the identification of a learning signal role for NE or DA. Describing how the CS representation comes to relate to learned behavior, either through sensory-sensory associations, in which the CS acquires the motivational significance of reward or punishment, thus driving appropriate behavior, or through direct sensory-motor associations is necessary to identify how NE and DA participate in memory creation. As described here, evidence consistent with a direct learning signal role for NE and DA is seen in the changing of sensory circuits in odor preference learning (NE), defensive conditioning (NE), and auditory cortex remodeling in adult rats (DA). Evidence that NE and DA contribute to normal learning through unspecified mechanisms is extensive, but the details of that support role are lacking.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolyn W. Harley
spellingShingle Carolyn W. Harley
Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Carolyn W. Harley
author_sort Carolyn W. Harley
title Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
title_short Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
title_full Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
title_fullStr Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
title_full_unstemmed Norepinephrine and Dopamine as Learning Signals
title_sort norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The present review focuses on the hypothesis that norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) act as learning signals. Both NE and DA are broadly distributed in areas concerned with the representation of the world and with the conjunction of sensory inputs and motor outputs. Both are released at times of novelty and uncertainty, providing plausible signal events for updating representations and associations. These catecholamines activate intracellular machinery postulated to serve as a memory-formation cascade. Yet, despite the plausibility of an NE and DA role in vertebrate learning and memory, most evidence that they provide a learning signal is circumstantial. The major weakness of the data available is the lack of a specific description of how the neural circuit modulated by NE or DA participates in the learning being analyzed. Identifying a conditioned stimuli (CS) representation would facilitate the identification of a learning signal role for NE or DA. Describing how the CS representation comes to relate to learned behavior, either through sensory-sensory associations, in which the CS acquires the motivational significance of reward or punishment, thus driving appropriate behavior, or through direct sensory-motor associations is necessary to identify how NE and DA participate in memory creation. As described here, evidence consistent with a direct learning signal role for NE and DA is seen in the changing of sensory circuits in odor preference learning (NE), defensive conditioning (NE), and auditory cortex remodeling in adult rats (DA). Evidence that NE and DA contribute to normal learning through unspecified mechanisms is extensive, but the details of that support role are lacking.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/NP.2004.191
work_keys_str_mv AT carolynwharley norepinephrineanddopamineaslearningsignals
_version_ 1725608845291552768