Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study
Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) of five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents (DBA) with fifth-generation DBA before and after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Ten extracted teeth were assigned to fifth generation c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=6;spage=167;epage=171;aulast=Poptani |
id |
doaj-c6bc52eec94d411286dfa83bfacff853 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c6bc52eec94d411286dfa83bfacff8532020-11-24T21:44:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612012-01-013616717110.4103/0976-237X.101079Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro studyBruhvi PoptaniK S GohilJaishree GanjiwaleManisha ShuklaObjectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) of five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents (DBA) with fifth-generation DBA before and after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Ten extracted teeth were assigned to fifth generation control group (optibond solo) and each of the five experimental groups namely, Group I (G-Bond) ,Group II (S 3 Clearfil), Group III (One Coat 7.0), Group IV (Xeno V), and Group V (Optibond all in one). The crown portions of the teeth were horizontally sectioned below the central groove to expose the dentin. The adhesive resins from all groups were bonded to the teeth with their respective composites. Specimens of sizes 1 × 1 × 6 mm 3 were obtained. Fifty specimens that bonded to dentin from each group were selected. Twenty-five of the specimens were tested for debonding without thermocycling and the remaining were subjected to thermocycling followed by μTBS testing. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Dunnett′s-test for comparison with the reference group(Vth Generation). Results: There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the fifth- and seventh-generation adhesives before and after thermocycling. The results of our study showed significantly higher value (P < 0.05) of μTBS of seventh-generation Group II (Clearfil S 3 ) compared to the fifth-generation before and after thermocycling. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the Clearfil S 3 bond had the highest μTBS values. In addition, of the five tested seventh-generation adhesive resins were comparable to the fifth-generation DBA.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=6;spage=167;epage=171;aulast=PoptaniClearfil S3G-bondmicrotensile bond strengthoptibond soloone coat 7.0optibond all in onethermocyclingXeno V |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bruhvi Poptani K S Gohil Jaishree Ganjiwale Manisha Shukla |
spellingShingle |
Bruhvi Poptani K S Gohil Jaishree Ganjiwale Manisha Shukla Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Clearfil S3 G-bond microtensile bond strength optibond solo one coat 7.0 optibond all in one thermocycling Xeno V |
author_facet |
Bruhvi Poptani K S Gohil Jaishree Ganjiwale Manisha Shukla |
author_sort |
Bruhvi Poptani |
title |
Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study |
title_short |
Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study |
title_full |
Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study |
title_sort |
microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: an in vitro study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
issn |
0976-237X 0976-2361 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) of five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents (DBA) with fifth-generation DBA before and after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Ten extracted teeth were assigned to fifth generation control group (optibond solo) and each of the five experimental groups namely, Group I (G-Bond) ,Group II (S 3 Clearfil), Group III (One Coat 7.0), Group IV (Xeno V), and Group V (Optibond all in one). The crown portions of the teeth were horizontally sectioned below the central groove to expose the dentin. The adhesive resins from all groups were bonded to the teeth with their respective composites. Specimens of sizes 1 × 1 × 6 mm 3 were obtained. Fifty specimens that bonded to dentin from each group were selected. Twenty-five of the specimens were tested for debonding without thermocycling and the remaining were subjected to thermocycling followed by μTBS testing. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Dunnett′s-test for comparison with the reference group(Vth Generation). Results: There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the fifth- and seventh-generation adhesives before and after thermocycling. The results of our study showed significantly higher value (P < 0.05) of μTBS of seventh-generation Group II (Clearfil S 3 ) compared to the fifth-generation before and after thermocycling. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the Clearfil S 3 bond had the highest μTBS values. In addition, of the five tested seventh-generation adhesive resins were comparable to the fifth-generation DBA. |
topic |
Clearfil S3 G-bond microtensile bond strength optibond solo one coat 7.0 optibond all in one thermocycling Xeno V |
url |
http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=6;spage=167;epage=171;aulast=Poptani |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bruhvipoptani microtensiledentinbondstrengthoffifthwithfiveseventhgenerationdentinbondingagentsafterthermocyclinganinvitrostudy AT ksgohil microtensiledentinbondstrengthoffifthwithfiveseventhgenerationdentinbondingagentsafterthermocyclinganinvitrostudy AT jaishreeganjiwale microtensiledentinbondstrengthoffifthwithfiveseventhgenerationdentinbondingagentsafterthermocyclinganinvitrostudy AT manishashukla microtensiledentinbondstrengthoffifthwithfiveseventhgenerationdentinbondingagentsafterthermocyclinganinvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1725909518031781888 |