Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification

Interpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the densit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten Bassier, Maarten Vergauwen, Florent Poux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
BIM
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224
id doaj-c6b497034d4b45068023586f2902a8a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6b497034d4b45068023586f2902a8a92020-11-25T03:25:50ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-07-01122224222410.3390/rs12142224Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior ClassificationMaarten Bassier0Maarten Vergauwen1Florent Poux2Department of Civil Engineering, TC Construction—Geomatics, KU Leuven—Faculty of Engineering Technology, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Civil Engineering, TC Construction—Geomatics, KU Leuven—Faculty of Engineering Technology, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumGeomatics Unit, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, BelgiumInterpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the density. Alternatively, 3D mesh geometries derived from point clouds benefit from preprocessing routines that can surmount these obstacles and potentially result in more refined geometry and topology descriptions. In this article, we provide a rigorous comparison of both geometries for scene interpretation. We present an empirical study on the suitability of both geometries for the feature extraction and classification. More specifically, we study the impact for the retrieval of structural building components in a realistic environment which is a major endeavor in Building Information Modeling (BIM) reconstruction. The study runs on segment-based structuration of both geometries and shows that both achieve recognition rates over 75% F1 score when suitable features are used.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224feature extractionunsupervised segmentationclassificationmachine learningBIMpoint clouds
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maarten Bassier
Maarten Vergauwen
Florent Poux
spellingShingle Maarten Bassier
Maarten Vergauwen
Florent Poux
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
Remote Sensing
feature extraction
unsupervised segmentation
classification
machine learning
BIM
point clouds
author_facet Maarten Bassier
Maarten Vergauwen
Florent Poux
author_sort Maarten Bassier
title Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
title_short Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
title_full Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
title_fullStr Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
title_full_unstemmed Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
title_sort point cloud vs. mesh features for building interior classification
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Interpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the density. Alternatively, 3D mesh geometries derived from point clouds benefit from preprocessing routines that can surmount these obstacles and potentially result in more refined geometry and topology descriptions. In this article, we provide a rigorous comparison of both geometries for scene interpretation. We present an empirical study on the suitability of both geometries for the feature extraction and classification. More specifically, we study the impact for the retrieval of structural building components in a realistic environment which is a major endeavor in Building Information Modeling (BIM) reconstruction. The study runs on segment-based structuration of both geometries and shows that both achieve recognition rates over 75% F1 score when suitable features are used.
topic feature extraction
unsupervised segmentation
classification
machine learning
BIM
point clouds
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenbassier pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification
AT maartenvergauwen pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification
AT florentpoux pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification
_version_ 1724595369939042304