Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification
Interpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the densit...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224 |
id |
doaj-c6b497034d4b45068023586f2902a8a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c6b497034d4b45068023586f2902a8a92020-11-25T03:25:50ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-07-01122224222410.3390/rs12142224Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior ClassificationMaarten Bassier0Maarten Vergauwen1Florent Poux2Department of Civil Engineering, TC Construction—Geomatics, KU Leuven—Faculty of Engineering Technology, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Civil Engineering, TC Construction—Geomatics, KU Leuven—Faculty of Engineering Technology, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumGeomatics Unit, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, BelgiumInterpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the density. Alternatively, 3D mesh geometries derived from point clouds benefit from preprocessing routines that can surmount these obstacles and potentially result in more refined geometry and topology descriptions. In this article, we provide a rigorous comparison of both geometries for scene interpretation. We present an empirical study on the suitability of both geometries for the feature extraction and classification. More specifically, we study the impact for the retrieval of structural building components in a realistic environment which is a major endeavor in Building Information Modeling (BIM) reconstruction. The study runs on segment-based structuration of both geometries and shows that both achieve recognition rates over 75% F1 score when suitable features are used.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224feature extractionunsupervised segmentationclassificationmachine learningBIMpoint clouds |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maarten Bassier Maarten Vergauwen Florent Poux |
spellingShingle |
Maarten Bassier Maarten Vergauwen Florent Poux Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification Remote Sensing feature extraction unsupervised segmentation classification machine learning BIM point clouds |
author_facet |
Maarten Bassier Maarten Vergauwen Florent Poux |
author_sort |
Maarten Bassier |
title |
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification |
title_short |
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification |
title_full |
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification |
title_fullStr |
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Point Cloud vs. Mesh Features for Building Interior Classification |
title_sort |
point cloud vs. mesh features for building interior classification |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Interpreting 3D point cloud data of the interior and exterior of buildings is essential for automated navigation, interaction and 3D reconstruction. However, the direct exploitation of the geometry is challenging due to inherent obstacles such as noise, occlusions, sparsity or variance in the density. Alternatively, 3D mesh geometries derived from point clouds benefit from preprocessing routines that can surmount these obstacles and potentially result in more refined geometry and topology descriptions. In this article, we provide a rigorous comparison of both geometries for scene interpretation. We present an empirical study on the suitability of both geometries for the feature extraction and classification. More specifically, we study the impact for the retrieval of structural building components in a realistic environment which is a major endeavor in Building Information Modeling (BIM) reconstruction. The study runs on segment-based structuration of both geometries and shows that both achieve recognition rates over 75% F1 score when suitable features are used. |
topic |
feature extraction unsupervised segmentation classification machine learning BIM point clouds |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/14/2224 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maartenbassier pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification AT maartenvergauwen pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification AT florentpoux pointcloudvsmeshfeaturesforbuildinginteriorclassification |
_version_ |
1724595369939042304 |