Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?

Introduction. Optimum perioperative fluid therapy is important to improve the outcome of the surgical patient. This study prospectively compared goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy with traditional fluid therapy in general surgical patients undergoing open major bowel surgery. Methodology. Pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prabhu P. Sujatha, Anitha Nileshwar, H. M. Krishna, S. S. Prasad, Manjunath Prabhu, Shobha U. Kamath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3408940
id doaj-c6a9cae709b249abadb1afec56fe03de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6a9cae709b249abadb1afec56fe03de2020-11-25T01:14:06ZengHindawi LimitedAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702019-01-01201910.1155/2019/34089403408940Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?Prabhu P. Sujatha0Anitha Nileshwar1H. M. Krishna2S. S. Prasad3Manjunath Prabhu4Shobha U. Kamath5Department of Physiology, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Biochemistry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, IndiaIntroduction. Optimum perioperative fluid therapy is important to improve the outcome of the surgical patient. This study prospectively compared goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy with traditional fluid therapy in general surgical patients undergoing open major bowel surgery. Methodology. Patients between 20 and 70 years of age, either gender, ASA I and II, and scheduled for elective open major bowel surgery were included in the study. Patients who underwent laparoscopic and other surgeries were excluded. After routine induction of general anaesthesia, the patients were randomised to either the control group (traditional fluid therapy), the FloTrac group (based on stroke volume variation), or the PVI group (based on pleth variability index). Fluid input and output, recovery characteristics, and complications were noted. Results. 306 patients, with 102 in each group, were enrolled. Five patients (control (1), FloTrac (2), and PVI (2)) were inoperable and were excluded. Demographic data, ASA PS, anaesthetic technique, duration of surgery, and surgical procedures were comparable. The control group received significantly more crystalloids (3200 ml) than the FloTrac (2000 ml) and PVI groups (1875 ml), whereas infusion of colloids was higher in the FloTrac (400–700 ml) and PVI (200–500 ml) groups than in the control group (0–500 ml). The control group had significantly positive net fluid balance intraoperatively (2500 ml, 9 ml/kg/h) compared to the FloTrac (1515 ml, 5.4 ml/kg/h) and PVI (1420 ml, 6 ml/kg/h) groups. Days to ICU stay, HDU stay, return of bowel movement, oral intake, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and survival rate were comparable. The total number of complications was not different between the three groups. Anastomotic leaks occurred more often in the Control group than in the others, but the numbers were small. Conclusions. Use of goal-directed fluid management, either with FloTrac or pleth variability index results in a lower volume infusion and lower net fluid balance. However, the complication rate is similar to that of traditional fluid therapy. This trial is registered with CTRI/2018/04/013016.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3408940
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Prabhu P. Sujatha
Anitha Nileshwar
H. M. Krishna
S. S. Prasad
Manjunath Prabhu
Shobha U. Kamath
spellingShingle Prabhu P. Sujatha
Anitha Nileshwar
H. M. Krishna
S. S. Prasad
Manjunath Prabhu
Shobha U. Kamath
Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
author_facet Prabhu P. Sujatha
Anitha Nileshwar
H. M. Krishna
S. S. Prasad
Manjunath Prabhu
Shobha U. Kamath
author_sort Prabhu P. Sujatha
title Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
title_short Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
title_full Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
title_fullStr Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
title_full_unstemmed Goal-Directed vs Traditional Approach to Intraoperative Fluid Therapy during Open Major Bowel Surgery: Is There a Difference?
title_sort goal-directed vs traditional approach to intraoperative fluid therapy during open major bowel surgery: is there a difference?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Introduction. Optimum perioperative fluid therapy is important to improve the outcome of the surgical patient. This study prospectively compared goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy with traditional fluid therapy in general surgical patients undergoing open major bowel surgery. Methodology. Patients between 20 and 70 years of age, either gender, ASA I and II, and scheduled for elective open major bowel surgery were included in the study. Patients who underwent laparoscopic and other surgeries were excluded. After routine induction of general anaesthesia, the patients were randomised to either the control group (traditional fluid therapy), the FloTrac group (based on stroke volume variation), or the PVI group (based on pleth variability index). Fluid input and output, recovery characteristics, and complications were noted. Results. 306 patients, with 102 in each group, were enrolled. Five patients (control (1), FloTrac (2), and PVI (2)) were inoperable and were excluded. Demographic data, ASA PS, anaesthetic technique, duration of surgery, and surgical procedures were comparable. The control group received significantly more crystalloids (3200 ml) than the FloTrac (2000 ml) and PVI groups (1875 ml), whereas infusion of colloids was higher in the FloTrac (400–700 ml) and PVI (200–500 ml) groups than in the control group (0–500 ml). The control group had significantly positive net fluid balance intraoperatively (2500 ml, 9 ml/kg/h) compared to the FloTrac (1515 ml, 5.4 ml/kg/h) and PVI (1420 ml, 6 ml/kg/h) groups. Days to ICU stay, HDU stay, return of bowel movement, oral intake, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and survival rate were comparable. The total number of complications was not different between the three groups. Anastomotic leaks occurred more often in the Control group than in the others, but the numbers were small. Conclusions. Use of goal-directed fluid management, either with FloTrac or pleth variability index results in a lower volume infusion and lower net fluid balance. However, the complication rate is similar to that of traditional fluid therapy. This trial is registered with CTRI/2018/04/013016.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3408940
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhupsujatha goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
AT anithanileshwar goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
AT hmkrishna goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
AT ssprasad goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
AT manjunathprabhu goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
AT shobhaukamath goaldirectedvstraditionalapproachtointraoperativefluidtherapyduringopenmajorbowelsurgeryisthereadifference
_version_ 1725158925912768512