Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015

The nosology and epidemiology of Autism has undergone transformation following consolidation of once disparate disorders under the umbrella diagnostic, autism spectrum disorders. Despite this re-conceptualization, research initiatives, including the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria and Precision Medi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline P. Whyatt, Elizabeth B. Torres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01526/full
id doaj-c6a1134d995345e2bede9e79f1f730c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6a1134d995345e2bede9e79f1f730c22020-11-24T21:09:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-08-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.01526359010Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015Caroline P. WhyattElizabeth B. TorresThe nosology and epidemiology of Autism has undergone transformation following consolidation of once disparate disorders under the umbrella diagnostic, autism spectrum disorders. Despite this re-conceptualization, research initiatives, including the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria and Precision Medicine, highlight the need to bridge psychiatric and psychological classification methodologies with biomedical techniques. Combining traditional bibliometric co-word techniques, with tenets of graph theory and network analysis, this article provides an objective thematic review of research between 1994 and 2015 to consider evolution and focus. Results illustrate growth in Autism research since 2006, with nascent focus on physiology. However, modularity and citation analytics demonstrate dominance of subjective psychological or psychiatric constructs, which may impede progress in the identification and stratification of biomarkers as endorsed by new research initiatives.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01526/fullautismquantitative reviewgraph theoryconnectivity metricsbibliometrics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caroline P. Whyatt
Elizabeth B. Torres
spellingShingle Caroline P. Whyatt
Elizabeth B. Torres
Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
Frontiers in Psychology
autism
quantitative review
graph theory
connectivity metrics
bibliometrics
author_facet Caroline P. Whyatt
Elizabeth B. Torres
author_sort Caroline P. Whyatt
title Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
title_short Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
title_full Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
title_fullStr Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
title_full_unstemmed Autism Research: An Objective Quantitative Review of Progress and Focus Between 1994 and 2015
title_sort autism research: an objective quantitative review of progress and focus between 1994 and 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-08-01
description The nosology and epidemiology of Autism has undergone transformation following consolidation of once disparate disorders under the umbrella diagnostic, autism spectrum disorders. Despite this re-conceptualization, research initiatives, including the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria and Precision Medicine, highlight the need to bridge psychiatric and psychological classification methodologies with biomedical techniques. Combining traditional bibliometric co-word techniques, with tenets of graph theory and network analysis, this article provides an objective thematic review of research between 1994 and 2015 to consider evolution and focus. Results illustrate growth in Autism research since 2006, with nascent focus on physiology. However, modularity and citation analytics demonstrate dominance of subjective psychological or psychiatric constructs, which may impede progress in the identification and stratification of biomarkers as endorsed by new research initiatives.
topic autism
quantitative review
graph theory
connectivity metrics
bibliometrics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01526/full
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinepwhyatt autismresearchanobjectivequantitativereviewofprogressandfocusbetween1994and2015
AT elizabethbtorres autismresearchanobjectivequantitativereviewofprogressandfocusbetween1994and2015
_version_ 1716756957277192192