Motion – Screening and Surveillance of Barrett’s Epithelium Is Practical and Cost Effective: Arguments against the Motion
The issue of whether to screen individuals for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is highly controversial. Important considerations are that BE is not highly prevalent in the general population and that not many patients with BE develop or die from EAC. Studies that...
Main Author: | Naoki Chiba |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2002-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/354181 |
Similar Items
-
Motion - Colonoscopic Surveillance is more Cost Effective than Colectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Arguments Against the Motion
by: Anders Ekbom
Published: (2003-01-01) -
Motion – The Available Treatments for Hepatitis C Are Cost Effective: Arguments against the Motion
by: W Ray Kim
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion - Colonoscopic Surveillance is More Cost Effective than Colectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Arguments for the Motion
by: Bret A Lashner
Published: (2003-01-01) -
Motion - Computerized Tomographic Colography is a Better Method for Screening for Polyps: Arguments Against the Motion
by: Jerome B Simon
Published: (2003-01-01) -
Motion – The Available Treatments for Hepatits C Are Cost Effective: Arguments for the Motion
by: Norah Terrault
Published: (2002-01-01)