Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
Perceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2009-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/full |
id |
doaj-c693a05542184fd282826f1503fd924a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c693a05542184fd282826f1503fd924a2020-11-24T22:57:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2009-12-01310.3389/neuro.01.035.2009879Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational modelsNikolaus Kriegeskorte0MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitPerceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need to quantitatively relate population-code representations. Here I give a brief introduction to representational similarity analysis (RSA), a particular approach to this problem. A population code is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which contains a dissimilarity for each pair of activity patterns elicited by a given stimulus set. The RDM encapsulates which distinctions the representation emphasizes and which it deemphasizes. By analyzing correlations between RDMs we can test models and compare different species. Moreover, we can study how representations are transformed across stages of processing and how they relate to behavioral measures of object similarity. We use an example from object vision to illustrate the method’s potential to bridge major divides that have hampered progress in systems neuroscience.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/fullpattern-information analysispopulation codeVisioncell recordingcomputational modelfMRI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte |
spellingShingle |
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models Frontiers in Neuroscience pattern-information analysis population code Vision cell recording computational model fMRI |
author_facet |
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte |
author_sort |
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte |
title |
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
title_short |
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
title_full |
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
title_fullStr |
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
title_sort |
relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-453X |
publishDate |
2009-12-01 |
description |
Perceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need to quantitatively relate population-code representations. Here I give a brief introduction to representational similarity analysis (RSA), a particular approach to this problem. A population code is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which contains a dissimilarity for each pair of activity patterns elicited by a given stimulus set. The RDM encapsulates which distinctions the representation emphasizes and which it deemphasizes. By analyzing correlations between RDMs we can test models and compare different species. Moreover, we can study how representations are transformed across stages of processing and how they relate to behavioral measures of object similarity. We use an example from object vision to illustrate the method’s potential to bridge major divides that have hampered progress in systems neuroscience. |
topic |
pattern-information analysis population code Vision cell recording computational model fMRI |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikolauskriegeskorte relatingpopulationcoderepresentationsbetweenmanmonkeyandcomputationalmodels |
_version_ |
1725649402912047104 |