Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models

Perceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2009-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/full
id doaj-c693a05542184fd282826f1503fd924a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c693a05542184fd282826f1503fd924a2020-11-24T22:57:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2009-12-01310.3389/neuro.01.035.2009879Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational modelsNikolaus Kriegeskorte0MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitPerceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need to quantitatively relate population-code representations. Here I give a brief introduction to representational similarity analysis (RSA), a particular approach to this problem. A population code is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which contains a dissimilarity for each pair of activity patterns elicited by a given stimulus set. The RDM encapsulates which distinctions the representation emphasizes and which it deemphasizes. By analyzing correlations between RDMs we can test models and compare different species. Moreover, we can study how representations are transformed across stages of processing and how they relate to behavioral measures of object similarity. We use an example from object vision to illustrate the method’s potential to bridge major divides that have hampered progress in systems neuroscience.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/fullpattern-information analysispopulation codeVisioncell recordingcomputational modelfMRI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
spellingShingle Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
Frontiers in Neuroscience
pattern-information analysis
population code
Vision
cell recording
computational model
fMRI
author_facet Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
author_sort Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
title Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
title_short Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
title_full Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
title_fullStr Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
title_full_unstemmed Relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
title_sort relating population-code representations between man, monkey, and computational models
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2009-12-01
description Perceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need to quantitatively relate population-code representations. Here I give a brief introduction to representational similarity analysis (RSA), a particular approach to this problem. A population code is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which contains a dissimilarity for each pair of activity patterns elicited by a given stimulus set. The RDM encapsulates which distinctions the representation emphasizes and which it deemphasizes. By analyzing correlations between RDMs we can test models and compare different species. Moreover, we can study how representations are transformed across stages of processing and how they relate to behavioral measures of object similarity. We use an example from object vision to illustrate the method’s potential to bridge major divides that have hampered progress in systems neuroscience.
topic pattern-information analysis
population code
Vision
cell recording
computational model
fMRI
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.01.035.2009/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolauskriegeskorte relatingpopulationcoderepresentationsbetweenmanmonkeyandcomputationalmodels
_version_ 1725649402912047104