A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
Lightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.5...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Open Chemistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073 |
id |
doaj-c677a4dc3bcb485a81384b2913536bcb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c677a4dc3bcb485a81384b2913536bcb2021-09-06T19:19:35ZengDe GruyterOpen Chemistry2391-54202019-08-0117162963810.1515/chem-2019-0073chem-2019-0073A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesisAnggarini Ufafa0Pratapa Suminar1Purnomo Victor2Sukmana Ndaru Candra3Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Gresik, IndonesiaDepartment of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, Surabaya, IndonesiaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Gresik, IndonesiaDepartment of Engineering Management, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, GresikIndonesiaLightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.50, and 1:2.00, while the ratios of aluminum powder weight percentage to the fly ash weight varied between 0.01 - 0.15 %wt. The results showed that the higher foaming agent content, the lower the compressive strength and density of the geopolymer. The ratio of the geopolymer paste to the foaming agent, 1:1.33 was found to produce the strongest light weight geopolymer whose compressive strength and density were 33 MPa and 1760 kg/m3, respectively. With the addition of 0.01%wt aluminum powder, the geopolymer specimen showed the highest compressive strength of 42 MPa and density of 1830 kg/m3, respectively. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and FT-IR were utilized to study the effects of foaming agent and aluminum powder addition onto the microstructure, surface morphology, and functional groups of the geopolymer. Both types of synthesized geopolymers have the potential to be developed in terms of compressive strength and density in the future.https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073geopolymerfoaming agentaluminum powdercompressive strengthdensity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anggarini Ufafa Pratapa Suminar Purnomo Victor Sukmana Ndaru Candra |
spellingShingle |
Anggarini Ufafa Pratapa Suminar Purnomo Victor Sukmana Ndaru Candra A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis Open Chemistry geopolymer foaming agent aluminum powder compressive strength density |
author_facet |
Anggarini Ufafa Pratapa Suminar Purnomo Victor Sukmana Ndaru Candra |
author_sort |
Anggarini Ufafa |
title |
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
title_short |
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
title_full |
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
title_fullStr |
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
title_sort |
comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Chemistry |
issn |
2391-5420 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Lightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.50, and 1:2.00, while the ratios of aluminum powder weight percentage to the fly ash weight varied between 0.01 - 0.15 %wt. The results showed that the higher foaming agent content, the lower the compressive strength and density of the geopolymer. The ratio of the geopolymer paste to the foaming agent, 1:1.33 was found to produce the strongest light weight geopolymer whose compressive strength and density were 33 MPa and 1760 kg/m3, respectively. With the addition of 0.01%wt aluminum powder, the geopolymer specimen showed the highest compressive strength of 42 MPa and density of 1830 kg/m3, respectively. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and FT-IR were utilized to study the effects of foaming agent and aluminum powder addition onto the microstructure, surface morphology, and functional groups of the geopolymer. Both types of synthesized geopolymers have the potential to be developed in terms of compressive strength and density in the future. |
topic |
geopolymer foaming agent aluminum powder compressive strength density |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anggariniufafa acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT pratapasuminar acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT purnomovictor acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT sukmanandarucandra acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT anggariniufafa comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT pratapasuminar comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT purnomovictor comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis AT sukmanandarucandra comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis |
_version_ |
1717778205245440000 |