A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis

Lightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anggarini Ufafa, Pratapa Suminar, Purnomo Victor, Sukmana Ndaru Candra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-08-01
Series:Open Chemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073
id doaj-c677a4dc3bcb485a81384b2913536bcb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c677a4dc3bcb485a81384b2913536bcb2021-09-06T19:19:35ZengDe GruyterOpen Chemistry2391-54202019-08-0117162963810.1515/chem-2019-0073chem-2019-0073A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesisAnggarini Ufafa0Pratapa Suminar1Purnomo Victor2Sukmana Ndaru Candra3Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Gresik, IndonesiaDepartment of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, Surabaya, IndonesiaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, Gresik, IndonesiaDepartment of Engineering Management, Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia, GresikIndonesiaLightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.50, and 1:2.00, while the ratios of aluminum powder weight percentage to the fly ash weight varied between 0.01 - 0.15 %wt. The results showed that the higher foaming agent content, the lower the compressive strength and density of the geopolymer. The ratio of the geopolymer paste to the foaming agent, 1:1.33 was found to produce the strongest light weight geopolymer whose compressive strength and density were 33 MPa and 1760 kg/m3, respectively. With the addition of 0.01%wt aluminum powder, the geopolymer specimen showed the highest compressive strength of 42 MPa and density of 1830 kg/m3, respectively. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and FT-IR were utilized to study the effects of foaming agent and aluminum powder addition onto the microstructure, surface morphology, and functional groups of the geopolymer. Both types of synthesized geopolymers have the potential to be developed in terms of compressive strength and density in the future.https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073geopolymerfoaming agentaluminum powdercompressive strengthdensity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anggarini Ufafa
Pratapa Suminar
Purnomo Victor
Sukmana Ndaru Candra
spellingShingle Anggarini Ufafa
Pratapa Suminar
Purnomo Victor
Sukmana Ndaru Candra
A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
Open Chemistry
geopolymer
foaming agent
aluminum powder
compressive strength
density
author_facet Anggarini Ufafa
Pratapa Suminar
Purnomo Victor
Sukmana Ndaru Candra
author_sort Anggarini Ufafa
title A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
title_short A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
title_full A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
title_fullStr A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
title_sort comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Chemistry
issn 2391-5420
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Lightweight geopolymer concrete was synthesized using fly ash as an aluminosilicate source with the addition of a pore-forming agent. The synthesis of a geopolymer was conducted by employing various volume ratios of geopolymer paste to the foaming agent: 1:0.50, 1:0.67, 1:0.75, 1:1.00, 1:1.33, 1:1.50, and 1:2.00, while the ratios of aluminum powder weight percentage to the fly ash weight varied between 0.01 - 0.15 %wt. The results showed that the higher foaming agent content, the lower the compressive strength and density of the geopolymer. The ratio of the geopolymer paste to the foaming agent, 1:1.33 was found to produce the strongest light weight geopolymer whose compressive strength and density were 33 MPa and 1760 kg/m3, respectively. With the addition of 0.01%wt aluminum powder, the geopolymer specimen showed the highest compressive strength of 42 MPa and density of 1830 kg/m3, respectively. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and FT-IR were utilized to study the effects of foaming agent and aluminum powder addition onto the microstructure, surface morphology, and functional groups of the geopolymer. Both types of synthesized geopolymers have the potential to be developed in terms of compressive strength and density in the future.
topic geopolymer
foaming agent
aluminum powder
compressive strength
density
url https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073
work_keys_str_mv AT anggariniufafa acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT pratapasuminar acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT purnomovictor acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT sukmanandarucandra acomparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT anggariniufafa comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT pratapasuminar comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT purnomovictor comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
AT sukmanandarucandra comparativestudyoftheutilizationofsyntheticfoamingagentandaluminumpowderasporeformingagentsinlightweightgeopolymersynthesis
_version_ 1717778205245440000