Human rights and divine justice

This article discusses the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are essentially secular and require rejection of God’s will as source of moral authority. Firstly, it analyses Cliteur’s reception of Kant and his claim that an exclusively anthropological grounding of human right...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan Muis
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2014-11-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/2740
id doaj-c671be00e32c406faf0b839166127718
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c671be00e32c406faf0b8391661277182020-11-24T21:28:14ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502014-11-01701e1e810.4102/hts.v70i1.27402396Human rights and divine justiceJan Muis0Protestant Theological University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Dogmatics and Christian Ethics, Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria, South AfricaThis article discusses the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are essentially secular and require rejection of God’s will as source of moral authority. Firstly, it analyses Cliteur’s reception of Kant and his claim that an exclusively anthropological grounding of human rights is the only possible one. Next, it investigates Nicholas Wolterstorff’s criticism of Kant’s grounding of human dignity in the rational capacity of mankind and his theistic grounding of human rights in God’s love by the mediating concept of human worth. Although Wolterstorff rightly believes that God’s special relationship with human beings is ultimately the best ground for human rights, his understandings of God’s love and of human worth appear to be problematic. Finally, the article explores the possibility to ground human rights directly in God’s justice by construing creation, the giving of the Ten Commandments and the justification of the sinner as central divine acts of justice in which God has given human rights to all human beings.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/2740
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Muis
spellingShingle Jan Muis
Human rights and divine justice
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
author_facet Jan Muis
author_sort Jan Muis
title Human rights and divine justice
title_short Human rights and divine justice
title_full Human rights and divine justice
title_fullStr Human rights and divine justice
title_full_unstemmed Human rights and divine justice
title_sort human rights and divine justice
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2014-11-01
description This article discusses the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are essentially secular and require rejection of God’s will as source of moral authority. Firstly, it analyses Cliteur’s reception of Kant and his claim that an exclusively anthropological grounding of human rights is the only possible one. Next, it investigates Nicholas Wolterstorff’s criticism of Kant’s grounding of human dignity in the rational capacity of mankind and his theistic grounding of human rights in God’s love by the mediating concept of human worth. Although Wolterstorff rightly believes that God’s special relationship with human beings is ultimately the best ground for human rights, his understandings of God’s love and of human worth appear to be problematic. Finally, the article explores the possibility to ground human rights directly in God’s justice by construing creation, the giving of the Ten Commandments and the justification of the sinner as central divine acts of justice in which God has given human rights to all human beings.
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/2740
work_keys_str_mv AT janmuis humanrightsanddivinejustice
_version_ 1725971467665932288