Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state

Donald Trump, an outsider who won the Presidency against all odds and predictions, came to the White House apparently determined to chart a new strategic course in foreign affairs. His opponent, Hillary Clinton, was committed to a hegemonistic vision and to specific policies based on the decades-old...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trifković Srđa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, Serbia 2017-01-01
Series:Politeia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2017/2232-96411713028T.pdf
id doaj-c66151af01454b4b89fc2b7168e4dbf4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c66151af01454b4b89fc2b7168e4dbf42020-11-24T21:24:19ZengFaculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, SerbiaPoliteia2232-96412017-01-01713285210.5937/pol1713028T2232-96411713028TTrump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep stateTrifković Srđa0University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences, Belgrade, SerbiaDonald Trump, an outsider who won the Presidency against all odds and predictions, came to the White House apparently determined to chart a new strategic course in foreign affairs. His opponent, Hillary Clinton, was committed to a hegemonistic vision and to specific policies based on the decades-old globalist-liberal orthodoxy. As this paper points out, Trump's 'America First' approach in essence rejected the doctrine of America as a proposition nation, criticized its global engagement, questioned NATO's utility and core mission, advocated rapprochement with Russia, and condemned the regime-change focus of earlier administrations. It further emphasizes that Trump explicitly sought to reaffirm the raison d'état as the guiding principle of foreign policymaking. His biggest problem all along was that the American 'deep state' - key components of the national security apparat, the military-industrial complex, and the bipartisan political duopoly in Washington - rejected any realist criteria in their definition of 'interests' and 'threats.' They were intent on the maintenance of American global primacy, and they proved effective in imposing agenda contrary to Trump's stated positions on all key global issues. At the same time, as this paper documents, Trump himself has been stepping ever farther away from his campaign pledges. It would be incorrect to say that the permanent state has successfully subverted and undermined the chief executive. It would be more accurate, we conclude, to recognize that a mutinous president has tried, and failed, to alter the long-charted global course of the permanent state.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2017/2232-96411713028T.pdfTrumpdeep stateglobal hegemonyrealismexceptionalismduopolymedia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trifković Srđa
spellingShingle Trifković Srđa
Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
Politeia
Trump
deep state
global hegemony
realism
exceptionalism
duopoly
media
author_facet Trifković Srđa
author_sort Trifković Srđa
title Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
title_short Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
title_full Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
title_fullStr Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
title_full_unstemmed Trump's foreign policy: A victory for the deep state
title_sort trump's foreign policy: a victory for the deep state
publisher Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, Serbia
series Politeia
issn 2232-9641
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Donald Trump, an outsider who won the Presidency against all odds and predictions, came to the White House apparently determined to chart a new strategic course in foreign affairs. His opponent, Hillary Clinton, was committed to a hegemonistic vision and to specific policies based on the decades-old globalist-liberal orthodoxy. As this paper points out, Trump's 'America First' approach in essence rejected the doctrine of America as a proposition nation, criticized its global engagement, questioned NATO's utility and core mission, advocated rapprochement with Russia, and condemned the regime-change focus of earlier administrations. It further emphasizes that Trump explicitly sought to reaffirm the raison d'état as the guiding principle of foreign policymaking. His biggest problem all along was that the American 'deep state' - key components of the national security apparat, the military-industrial complex, and the bipartisan political duopoly in Washington - rejected any realist criteria in their definition of 'interests' and 'threats.' They were intent on the maintenance of American global primacy, and they proved effective in imposing agenda contrary to Trump's stated positions on all key global issues. At the same time, as this paper documents, Trump himself has been stepping ever farther away from his campaign pledges. It would be incorrect to say that the permanent state has successfully subverted and undermined the chief executive. It would be more accurate, we conclude, to recognize that a mutinous president has tried, and failed, to alter the long-charted global course of the permanent state.
topic Trump
deep state
global hegemony
realism
exceptionalism
duopoly
media
url http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2017/2232-96411713028T.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT trifkovicsrđa trumpsforeignpolicyavictoryforthedeepstate
_version_ 1725988947158368256