An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship

Despite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bing Ran, Scott Weller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563
id doaj-c658a9d264594b43a91ba8ab8a4b5c4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c658a9d264594b43a91ba8ab8a4b5c4b2021-01-09T00:06:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-01-011356356310.3390/su13020563An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social EntrepreneurshipBing Ran0Scott Weller1School of Public Affairs, Penn State University at Harrisburg, 17057 Harrisburg Pike Middletown, PA, USASchool of Public Affairs, Penn State University at Harrisburg, 17057 Harrisburg Pike Middletown, PA, USADespite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this conceptual paper proposes a theoretical framework outlining social entrepreneurship as a three-dimensional framework as a function of continua of “social” and “business” logics, “beneficial” and “detrimental” social change logics, and “innovation” and “mundane” logics. The framework accommodates the fuzziness and ambiguity associated with social entrepreneurship whilst remaining a workable, identifiable construct. By accounting for the shifting logics practiced by social entrepreneurship that both influence and are influenced by the organizational environment, this framework provides an exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness of social entrepreneurship. The resultant structures and functions of social entrepreneurship are shaped by these constraints as reflected by the fluidity and flexibility endorsed by the framework. Four avenues for future research regarding social entrepreneurship are recommended on the basis of the framework proposed in this article.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563social entrepreneurshipdefinitionsocial and business logicsbeneficial logicsinnovation logics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bing Ran
Scott Weller
spellingShingle Bing Ran
Scott Weller
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
Sustainability
social entrepreneurship
definition
social and business logics
beneficial logics
innovation logics
author_facet Bing Ran
Scott Weller
author_sort Bing Ran
title An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
title_short An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
title_full An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
title_fullStr An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
title_full_unstemmed An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
title_sort exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness: a three-dimensional framework for social entrepreneurship
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Despite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this conceptual paper proposes a theoretical framework outlining social entrepreneurship as a three-dimensional framework as a function of continua of “social” and “business” logics, “beneficial” and “detrimental” social change logics, and “innovation” and “mundane” logics. The framework accommodates the fuzziness and ambiguity associated with social entrepreneurship whilst remaining a workable, identifiable construct. By accounting for the shifting logics practiced by social entrepreneurship that both influence and are influenced by the organizational environment, this framework provides an exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness of social entrepreneurship. The resultant structures and functions of social entrepreneurship are shaped by these constraints as reflected by the fluidity and flexibility endorsed by the framework. Four avenues for future research regarding social entrepreneurship are recommended on the basis of the framework proposed in this article.
topic social entrepreneurship
definition
social and business logics
beneficial logics
innovation logics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563
work_keys_str_mv AT bingran anexitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship
AT scottweller anexitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship
AT bingran exitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship
AT scottweller exitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship
_version_ 1724344139878760448