An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship
Despite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563 |
id |
doaj-c658a9d264594b43a91ba8ab8a4b5c4b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c658a9d264594b43a91ba8ab8a4b5c4b2021-01-09T00:06:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-01-011356356310.3390/su13020563An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social EntrepreneurshipBing Ran0Scott Weller1School of Public Affairs, Penn State University at Harrisburg, 17057 Harrisburg Pike Middletown, PA, USASchool of Public Affairs, Penn State University at Harrisburg, 17057 Harrisburg Pike Middletown, PA, USADespite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this conceptual paper proposes a theoretical framework outlining social entrepreneurship as a three-dimensional framework as a function of continua of “social” and “business” logics, “beneficial” and “detrimental” social change logics, and “innovation” and “mundane” logics. The framework accommodates the fuzziness and ambiguity associated with social entrepreneurship whilst remaining a workable, identifiable construct. By accounting for the shifting logics practiced by social entrepreneurship that both influence and are influenced by the organizational environment, this framework provides an exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness of social entrepreneurship. The resultant structures and functions of social entrepreneurship are shaped by these constraints as reflected by the fluidity and flexibility endorsed by the framework. Four avenues for future research regarding social entrepreneurship are recommended on the basis of the framework proposed in this article.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563social entrepreneurshipdefinitionsocial and business logicsbeneficial logicsinnovation logics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bing Ran Scott Weller |
spellingShingle |
Bing Ran Scott Weller An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship Sustainability social entrepreneurship definition social and business logics beneficial logics innovation logics |
author_facet |
Bing Ran Scott Weller |
author_sort |
Bing Ran |
title |
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship |
title_short |
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship |
title_full |
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship |
title_fullStr |
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship |
title_sort |
exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness: a three-dimensional framework for social entrepreneurship |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Despite the growing utility and prevalence of social entrepreneurship, an accepted definition remains elusive and infeasible. Yet, it is imperative that the principles guiding social entrepreneurship are identified so that common ground is established to facilitate future research. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this conceptual paper proposes a theoretical framework outlining social entrepreneurship as a three-dimensional framework as a function of continua of “social” and “business” logics, “beneficial” and “detrimental” social change logics, and “innovation” and “mundane” logics. The framework accommodates the fuzziness and ambiguity associated with social entrepreneurship whilst remaining a workable, identifiable construct. By accounting for the shifting logics practiced by social entrepreneurship that both influence and are influenced by the organizational environment, this framework provides an exit strategy for the definitional elusiveness of social entrepreneurship. The resultant structures and functions of social entrepreneurship are shaped by these constraints as reflected by the fluidity and flexibility endorsed by the framework. Four avenues for future research regarding social entrepreneurship are recommended on the basis of the framework proposed in this article. |
topic |
social entrepreneurship definition social and business logics beneficial logics innovation logics |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/563 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bingran anexitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship AT scottweller anexitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship AT bingran exitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship AT scottweller exitstrategyforthedefinitionalelusivenessathreedimensionalframeworkforsocialentrepreneurship |
_version_ |
1724344139878760448 |