Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
This article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdf |
id |
doaj-c65366473c954af595c7564d82deed04 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c65366473c954af595c7564d82deed042021-03-02T05:44:27ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172016-01-01Rg 24749910.12946/rg24/074-0991017Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866Jakob ZollmannThis article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of the German Federal Act (1815) (Bundesakte) was the basic norm of the so-called Austrägal jurisdiction enacted to resolve disputes between states of the German Confederation and stipulated the manner in which the dispute was to be brought to ›court‹ (Austrägalinstanz). During the period of the German Confederation, 10 out of 25 German courts of third instance handled altogether 54 Austrägal cases. Whereas Austrägal jurisdiction was no longer present in the German Kaiserreich, Emperor William II and the professor of public law Paul Laband attempted to resurrect the idea, but failed due to the resistance of the other German princes.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdfMPIeR |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jakob Zollmann |
spellingShingle |
Jakob Zollmann Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History MPIeR |
author_facet |
Jakob Zollmann |
author_sort |
Jakob Zollmann |
title |
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
title_short |
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
title_full |
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
title_fullStr |
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
title_sort |
austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866 |
publisher |
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory |
series |
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
issn |
1619-4993 2195-9617 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
This article analyses the interstate dispute settlement
mechanisms between member states of the
German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The
question as to how disputes between German
sovereigns should be decided already had a long
(pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages.
Article 11 IV of the German Federal Act (1815)
(Bundesakte) was the basic norm of the so-called
Austrägal jurisdiction enacted to resolve disputes
between states of the German Confederation and
stipulated the manner in which the dispute was to
be brought to ›court‹ (Austrägalinstanz). During the
period of the German Confederation, 10 out of
25 German courts of third instance handled altogether
54 Austrägal cases. Whereas Austrägal jurisdiction
was no longer present in the German
Kaiserreich, Emperor William II and the professor
of public law Paul Laband attempted to resurrect
the idea, but failed due to the resistance of the
other German princes. |
topic |
MPIeR |
url |
http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jakobzollmann austragalgerichtsbarkeitinterstatedisputesettlementinaconfederatearrangement1815to1866 |
_version_ |
1724242373054038016 |