Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866

This article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jakob Zollmann
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2016-01-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdf
id doaj-c65366473c954af595c7564d82deed04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c65366473c954af595c7564d82deed042021-03-02T05:44:27ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172016-01-01Rg 24749910.12946/rg24/074-0991017Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866Jakob ZollmannThis article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of the German Federal Act (1815) (Bundesakte) was the basic norm of the so-called Austrägal jurisdiction enacted to resolve disputes between states of the German Confederation and stipulated the manner in which the dispute was to be brought to ›court‹ (Austrägalinstanz). During the period of the German Confederation, 10 out of 25 German courts of third instance handled altogether 54 Austrägal cases. Whereas Austrägal jurisdiction was no longer present in the German Kaiserreich, Emperor William II and the professor of public law Paul Laband attempted to resurrect the idea, but failed due to the resistance of the other German princes.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdfMPIeR
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakob Zollmann
spellingShingle Jakob Zollmann
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
MPIeR
author_facet Jakob Zollmann
author_sort Jakob Zollmann
title Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
title_short Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
title_full Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
title_fullStr Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
title_full_unstemmed Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – Interstate Dispute Settlement in a Confederate Arrangement, 1815 to 1866
title_sort austrägalgerichtsbarkeit – interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of the German Federal Act (1815) (Bundesakte) was the basic norm of the so-called Austrägal jurisdiction enacted to resolve disputes between states of the German Confederation and stipulated the manner in which the dispute was to be brought to ›court‹ (Austrägalinstanz). During the period of the German Confederation, 10 out of 25 German courts of third instance handled altogether 54 Austrägal cases. Whereas Austrägal jurisdiction was no longer present in the German Kaiserreich, Emperor William II and the professor of public law Paul Laband attempted to resurrect the idea, but failed due to the resistance of the other German princes.
topic MPIeR
url http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg24_074zollmann.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobzollmann austragalgerichtsbarkeitinterstatedisputesettlementinaconfederatearrangement1815to1866
_version_ 1724242373054038016