The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
Abstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental met...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Conservation Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710 |
id |
doaj-c64e0fb77b144893a11ff50f7e4ef753 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c64e0fb77b144893a11ff50f7e4ef7532020-11-25T02:59:15ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2020-07-01134n/an/a10.1111/conl.12710The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in EcuadorKelly W Jones0Nicolle Etchart1Margaret Holland2Lisa Naughton-Treves3Rodrigo Arriagada4Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins ColoradoDepartment of Geography University of Wisconsin Madison WisconsinDepartment of Geography & Environmental Systems University of Maryland Baltimore County Baltimore MarylandDepartment of Geography University of Wisconsin Madison WisconsinMillennium Nucleus Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago ChileAbstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental methods to test for relationships between program participation and changes in land conflicts. Respondents reported that the program reduced land conflicts when households resided in communities with de facto communal tenure arrangements (vs. de facto semiprivate arrangements). We find no evidence that the conservation incentive program increased land conflicts. These results counter concerns that conservation payments undermine land tenure security; in some cases perceived tenure security is improved.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710impact evaluationland conflictsland tenurepayment for ecosystem servicesquasi-experimentalSocio Bosque |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kelly W Jones Nicolle Etchart Margaret Holland Lisa Naughton-Treves Rodrigo Arriagada |
spellingShingle |
Kelly W Jones Nicolle Etchart Margaret Holland Lisa Naughton-Treves Rodrigo Arriagada The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador Conservation Letters impact evaluation land conflicts land tenure payment for ecosystem services quasi-experimental Socio Bosque |
author_facet |
Kelly W Jones Nicolle Etchart Margaret Holland Lisa Naughton-Treves Rodrigo Arriagada |
author_sort |
Kelly W Jones |
title |
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador |
title_short |
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador |
title_full |
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador |
title_fullStr |
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador |
title_sort |
impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in ecuador |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Conservation Letters |
issn |
1755-263X |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental methods to test for relationships between program participation and changes in land conflicts. Respondents reported that the program reduced land conflicts when households resided in communities with de facto communal tenure arrangements (vs. de facto semiprivate arrangements). We find no evidence that the conservation incentive program increased land conflicts. These results counter concerns that conservation payments undermine land tenure security; in some cases perceived tenure security is improved. |
topic |
impact evaluation land conflicts land tenure payment for ecosystem services quasi-experimental Socio Bosque |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kellywjones theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT nicolleetchart theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT margaretholland theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT lisanaughtontreves theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT rodrigoarriagada theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT kellywjones impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT nicolleetchart impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT margaretholland impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT lisanaughtontreves impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador AT rodrigoarriagada impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador |
_version_ |
1724703461418729472 |