The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador

Abstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelly W Jones, Nicolle Etchart, Margaret Holland, Lisa Naughton-Treves, Rodrigo Arriagada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Conservation Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710
id doaj-c64e0fb77b144893a11ff50f7e4ef753
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c64e0fb77b144893a11ff50f7e4ef7532020-11-25T02:59:15ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2020-07-01134n/an/a10.1111/conl.12710The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in EcuadorKelly W Jones0Nicolle Etchart1Margaret Holland2Lisa Naughton-Treves3Rodrigo Arriagada4Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins ColoradoDepartment of Geography University of Wisconsin Madison WisconsinDepartment of Geography & Environmental Systems University of Maryland Baltimore County Baltimore MarylandDepartment of Geography University of Wisconsin Madison WisconsinMillennium Nucleus Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago ChileAbstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental methods to test for relationships between program participation and changes in land conflicts. Respondents reported that the program reduced land conflicts when households resided in communities with de facto communal tenure arrangements (vs. de facto semiprivate arrangements). We find no evidence that the conservation incentive program increased land conflicts. These results counter concerns that conservation payments undermine land tenure security; in some cases perceived tenure security is improved.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710impact evaluationland conflictsland tenurepayment for ecosystem servicesquasi-experimentalSocio Bosque
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kelly W Jones
Nicolle Etchart
Margaret Holland
Lisa Naughton-Treves
Rodrigo Arriagada
spellingShingle Kelly W Jones
Nicolle Etchart
Margaret Holland
Lisa Naughton-Treves
Rodrigo Arriagada
The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
Conservation Letters
impact evaluation
land conflicts
land tenure
payment for ecosystem services
quasi-experimental
Socio Bosque
author_facet Kelly W Jones
Nicolle Etchart
Margaret Holland
Lisa Naughton-Treves
Rodrigo Arriagada
author_sort Kelly W Jones
title The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
title_short The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
title_full The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
title_fullStr The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador
title_sort impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in ecuador
publisher Wiley
series Conservation Letters
issn 1755-263X
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract We study the impact of Ecuador's national forest conservation incentives program on reported land conflicts. Data come from a survey of >900 households located within 49 indigenous and Afro‐Ecuadorian communities holding communal conservation contracts. We use quasi‐experimental methods to test for relationships between program participation and changes in land conflicts. Respondents reported that the program reduced land conflicts when households resided in communities with de facto communal tenure arrangements (vs. de facto semiprivate arrangements). We find no evidence that the conservation incentive program increased land conflicts. These results counter concerns that conservation payments undermine land tenure security; in some cases perceived tenure security is improved.
topic impact evaluation
land conflicts
land tenure
payment for ecosystem services
quasi-experimental
Socio Bosque
url https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12710
work_keys_str_mv AT kellywjones theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT nicolleetchart theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT margaretholland theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT lisanaughtontreves theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT rodrigoarriagada theimpactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT kellywjones impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT nicolleetchart impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT margaretholland impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT lisanaughtontreves impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
AT rodrigoarriagada impactofpayingforforestconservationonperceivedtenuresecurityinecuador
_version_ 1724703461418729472