Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?

Areas left to natural development have been found to be sites with higher diversity and conservation value of local communities, including bird communities, compared to artificial reclamation of post-industrial areas. Most of the studies conducted so far have focused primarily on bird communities of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Novák Jakub, Hendrychová Markéta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Landscape Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0004
id doaj-c64d68be0b6d4e618a3e95c76d492935
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c64d68be0b6d4e618a3e95c76d4929352021-09-06T19:41:38ZengSciendoJournal of Landscape Ecology1805-41962021-05-01141597210.2478/jlecol-2021-0004Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?Novák Jakub0Hendrychová Markéta1Department of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha – Suchdol, 165 00, Czech RepublicDepartment of Landscape and Urban Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha – Suchdol, 165 00, Czech RepublicAreas left to natural development have been found to be sites with higher diversity and conservation value of local communities, including bird communities, compared to artificial reclamation of post-industrial areas. Most of the studies conducted so far have focused primarily on bird communities of post-mining areas, in terms of the diversity and richness of species. Our study dealt with bird nest predation on specific case of two experimental sites (20 and 32 ha) with more than a 20-year history of primary spontaneous succession established within the technical reclamation of the Radovesická spoil heap (approx. 1,200 ha, North Bohemia, Czech Republic). In the spring of 2018, we conducted a predation experiment using artificial nests (ground and elevated), installed within both succession areas and beyond, in the adjacent artificially reclaimed areas. We monitored the way of restoration and the distance of the nest placement from the succession-reclamation sites edge. The rate of predation was very high: 92.5 % in reclaimed area and 89.4 % in spontaneous successions. None of the observed factors analysed in the generalised linear model (GLM) have conclusively explained the risk of predation. The two experimental succession sites did not differ from the surrounding reclaimed sites in terms of the risk of predation, nor did they significantly influence predation risk on reclaimed sites. We believe that both relatively small and mutually isolated areas do not provide enough of an inner environment without or with at least a limited effect of predation pressure coming from adjacent reclaimed areas.https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0004predation riskspontaneous developmenttechnical reclamationnest predatormatrix effect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Novák Jakub
Hendrychová Markéta
spellingShingle Novák Jakub
Hendrychová Markéta
Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
Journal of Landscape Ecology
predation risk
spontaneous development
technical reclamation
nest predator
matrix effect
author_facet Novák Jakub
Hendrychová Markéta
author_sort Novák Jakub
title Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
title_short Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
title_full Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
title_fullStr Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
title_full_unstemmed Does Experimental Non-Reclaimed Sites Differ from Technically Reclaimed Areas in the Risk of Artificial Bird Nest Predation?
title_sort does experimental non-reclaimed sites differ from technically reclaimed areas in the risk of artificial bird nest predation?
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Landscape Ecology
issn 1805-4196
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Areas left to natural development have been found to be sites with higher diversity and conservation value of local communities, including bird communities, compared to artificial reclamation of post-industrial areas. Most of the studies conducted so far have focused primarily on bird communities of post-mining areas, in terms of the diversity and richness of species. Our study dealt with bird nest predation on specific case of two experimental sites (20 and 32 ha) with more than a 20-year history of primary spontaneous succession established within the technical reclamation of the Radovesická spoil heap (approx. 1,200 ha, North Bohemia, Czech Republic). In the spring of 2018, we conducted a predation experiment using artificial nests (ground and elevated), installed within both succession areas and beyond, in the adjacent artificially reclaimed areas. We monitored the way of restoration and the distance of the nest placement from the succession-reclamation sites edge. The rate of predation was very high: 92.5 % in reclaimed area and 89.4 % in spontaneous successions. None of the observed factors analysed in the generalised linear model (GLM) have conclusively explained the risk of predation. The two experimental succession sites did not differ from the surrounding reclaimed sites in terms of the risk of predation, nor did they significantly influence predation risk on reclaimed sites. We believe that both relatively small and mutually isolated areas do not provide enough of an inner environment without or with at least a limited effect of predation pressure coming from adjacent reclaimed areas.
topic predation risk
spontaneous development
technical reclamation
nest predator
matrix effect
url https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT novakjakub doesexperimentalnonreclaimedsitesdifferfromtechnicallyreclaimedareasintheriskofartificialbirdnestpredation
AT hendrychovamarketa doesexperimentalnonreclaimedsitesdifferfromtechnicallyreclaimedareasintheriskofartificialbirdnestpredation
_version_ 1717765713340399616