Comparative Analysis of Visual Field Plotting by Octopus Interzeag 1-2-3, Humphrey Field Analyser II and Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients in South Indian Population

Comparative Analysis of Visual Field Plotting by Octopus Interzeag 1-2-3, Humphrey Field Analyser II and Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients in South Indian Population

Purpose: Standard achromatic perimetry tests the differential light sensitivity whereas the frequency doubling technology tests the contrast sensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare and correlate the visual field indices with three different types of perimeters namely frequency doubling...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	AR RAJALAKSHMI, ELANGOVAN SUMA, D RANJIT PRABHU
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2015-07-01
Series:	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:	field defects frequency doubling technology standard achromatic perimetry time duration visual field indices
Online Access:	https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/6204/13001_CE(Ra1)_F(GH)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf

Similar Items

Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
by: Chandrasekhar G, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population
by: Parul Ichhpujani, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Diagnostic Possibilities of Standard Automatic and FunctionSpecific Perimetry (HFA, Octopus) in the Study of the Visual Field in Patients with Compression in the Chiasm-Sellar Region
by: N. A. Gavrilova, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Towards patient-tailored perimetry: automated perimetry can be improved by seeding procedures with patient-specific structural information
by: Denniss, Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors
by: Manav Deep Singh, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry
by: Xiaoxiao Ma, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Relationship between retinal sensitivity and disease activity in patients with psoriasis vulgaris
by: Helin Deniz Demir, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter
by: Tsapakis S, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Interpreting automated perimetry
by: Thomas Ravi, et al.
Published: (2001-01-01)

Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer
by: Kimura T, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Expediency of the Automated Perimetry Using the Goldmann V Stimulus Size in Visually Impaired Patients with Glaucoma
by: Adriana M. Morgan, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Automated achromatic perimetry
by: Anand Aggarwal, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Comparison between Humphrey Field Analyzer and Micro Perimeter 1 in normal and glaucoma subjects
by: Vineet Ratra, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Perimetria automatizada em pacientes com glaucoma congênito primário Automated perimetry in patients with primary congenital glaucoma
by: José Garone Gonçalves Lopes Filho, et al.
Published: (2007-02-01)

Evaluation of the progression of visual field damage in patients suffering from early manifest glaucoma
by: Perdicchi A, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)

COMPARISON OF FAST PERIMETRIC STRATEGIES USING G2 PROGRAM ON OCTOPUS 101 PERIMETER
by: Jernej Pajek, et al.
Published: (2002-12-01)

Programme choice for perimetry in neurological conditions (PoPiN): a systematic review of perimetry options and patterns of visual field loss
by: Lauren R. Hepworth, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Different Eye Movement Behaviors Related to Artificial Visual Field Defects–A Pilot Study of Video-Based Perimetry
by: Changtong Mao, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Long-term variability in short-wavelength automated perimetry compared to standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects
by: Chintan Malhotra
Published: (2009-01-01)

Relationship Between Visual Field Sensitivity and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Scanning Laser Polarimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography in Normal, Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucomatous Eyes
by: Antonio Lleó-Pérez, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

A comparison between the diagnostic results of short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients
by: Ahmed H Mohamed
Published: (2016-01-01)

Comparative evaluation of Octopus semi-automated kinetic perimeter with Humphrey and Goldmann perimeters in neuro-ophthalmic disorders
by: Karthika Bhaskaran, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children
by: Sibel Kocabeyoglu, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Relating optical coherence tomography to visual fields in glaucoma: structure–function mapping, limitations and future applications
by: Denniss, Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2018)

Humphrey custom program for driver's license verification to evaluate visual field of unilateral visual impaired applicants
by: Min Zheng, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up
by: Alencar Luciana, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Visual field (Octopus 1-2-3) in normal subjects divided into homogeneous age-groups Perimetria computadorizada no Octopus 1-2-3: estudo de uma população normal por faixas etárias estratificadas
by: Nassim Calixto, et al.
Published: (2006-10-01)

Interpreting automated perimetry.
by: Shukla Yogesh
Published: (2001-01-01)

Correlation between visual field index and other functional and structural measures in glaucoma patients and suspects
by: Natalia A Iutaka, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss
by: Prema Raju, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Comparison of the monocular Humphrey visual field and the binocular Humphrey esterman visual field test for driver licensing in glaucoma subjects in Sweden
by: Ayala Marcelo
Published: (2012-08-01)

Artifactual Visual Field Defects Identified on Technically “Reliable” Visual Field Studies in a Neuro-Ophthalmology Practice
by: Galarza P, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Improved automated perimetry performance in elderly subjects after listening to Mozart
by: Junia Cabral Marques, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Visual field defects in non-functioning pituitary adenomas.
by: Thomas Ravi, et al.
Published: (2002-01-01)

Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
by: Gloria Roberti, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

COMPARISON OF FAST STRATEGIES WITH NORMAL THRESHOLD STRATEGY USING OCTOPUS PROGRAMME M2 IN CENTRAL FIELD DEFECTS
by: Mojca Urbančič, et al.
Published: (2002-12-01)

Temporal Visual Field Border
by: Lestak J, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Speed and accuracy of saccades in patients with glaucoma evaluated using an eye tracking perimeter
by: Andrew J. Tatham, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Perimetria azul-amarelo em usuários de tabaco-álcool Blue-on-yellow perimetry in tobacco and alcohol consumers
by: José Fernando de Carvalho Júnior, et al.
Published: (2006-10-01)

Glaucoma suspect & Humphrey Field Analyzer a correlation
by: P Dahal, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01)