Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare entity and is difcult to differentiate from invasive ductal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation especially on small core biopsy specimens. Here we present one such challenging case of a 69 years old female who presented with in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megha Joshi, Lucy H. Kapur, Clarence Owens, Monika Roychowdhury, Ananya Kaul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jkimsu.com/jkimsu-vol5no1/JKIMSU,%20Vol.%205,%20No.%201,%20Jan-March%202016%20Page%20116-119.pdf
id doaj-c6460b73037244719f722e8f74a92b9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6460b73037244719f722e8f74a92b9f2020-11-25T01:06:12ZengKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences UniversityJournal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University2231-42612231-42612016-01-0151116119Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus MimicMegha Joshi0Lucy H. Kapur1 Clarence Owens2Monika Roychowdhury3Ananya Kaul4Department of Pathology, Lawrence General hospital, Lawrence, MA-01841,USADepartment of Pathology, Lawrence General hospital, Lawrence, MA-01841,USADepartment of Pathology, Lawrence General hospital, Lawrence, MA-01841,USADepartment of Pathology, Lawrence General hospital, Lawrence, MA-01841,USAUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut- 06269, USAPrimary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare entity and is difcult to differentiate from invasive ductal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation especially on small core biopsy specimens. Here we present one such challenging case of a 69 years old female who presented with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation. The biopsy specimen showed predominately invasive high grade tumor staining for neuroendocrine markers and negative cytokeratin markers, supporting a diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Follow up mastectomy showed in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. This case highlights the challenges of differentiating between these closely similar entities with overlapping features. Clinical history, thorough morphological examination and immunohistochemistry are needed to accurately classify these tumors as the treatment and prognosis vary signicantly. http://www.jkimsu.com/jkimsu-vol5no1/JKIMSU,%20Vol.%205,%20No.%201,%20Jan-March%202016%20Page%20116-119.pdfPrimary Neuroendocrine CarcinomaLarge Cell Neuroendocrine CarcinomaBreast Core Biopsy vs. Excision
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megha Joshi
Lucy H. Kapur
Clarence Owens
Monika Roychowdhury
Ananya Kaul
spellingShingle Megha Joshi
Lucy H. Kapur
Clarence Owens
Monika Roychowdhury
Ananya Kaul
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University
Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Breast Core Biopsy vs. Excision
author_facet Megha Joshi
Lucy H. Kapur
Clarence Owens
Monika Roychowdhury
Ananya Kaul
author_sort Megha Joshi
title Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
title_short Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
title_full Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
title_fullStr Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
title_full_unstemmed Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast – Real versus Mimic
title_sort neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast – real versus mimic
publisher Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University
series Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University
issn 2231-4261
2231-4261
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare entity and is difcult to differentiate from invasive ductal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation especially on small core biopsy specimens. Here we present one such challenging case of a 69 years old female who presented with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with neuroendocrine differentiation. The biopsy specimen showed predominately invasive high grade tumor staining for neuroendocrine markers and negative cytokeratin markers, supporting a diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Follow up mastectomy showed in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. This case highlights the challenges of differentiating between these closely similar entities with overlapping features. Clinical history, thorough morphological examination and immunohistochemistry are needed to accurately classify these tumors as the treatment and prognosis vary signicantly.
topic Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Breast Core Biopsy vs. Excision
url http://www.jkimsu.com/jkimsu-vol5no1/JKIMSU,%20Vol.%205,%20No.%201,%20Jan-March%202016%20Page%20116-119.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT meghajoshi neuroendocrinecarcinomaofthebreastrealversusmimic
AT lucyhkapur neuroendocrinecarcinomaofthebreastrealversusmimic
AT clarenceowens neuroendocrinecarcinomaofthebreastrealversusmimic
AT monikaroychowdhury neuroendocrinecarcinomaofthebreastrealversusmimic
AT ananyakaul neuroendocrinecarcinomaofthebreastrealversusmimic
_version_ 1725190830736539648