Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Musculoskeletal disorders particularly in the back and lower extremities are common among marines. Here, movement-control tests are considered clinically useful for screening and follow-up evaluation. However, few studies have addres...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/263 |
id |
doaj-c62d043760bd410d80caa0a55fdca73d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c62d043760bd410d80caa0a55fdca73d2020-11-24T23:28:39ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-12-0113126310.1186/1471-2474-13-263Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marinesMonnier AndreasHeuer JoachimNorman KjellÄng Björn O<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Musculoskeletal disorders particularly in the back and lower extremities are common among marines. Here, movement-control tests are considered clinically useful for screening and follow-up evaluation. However, few studies have addressed the reliability of clinical tests, and no such published data exists for marines. The present aim was therefore to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinically convenient tests emphasizing movement control of the back and hip among marines. A secondary aim was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical tests for discriminating musculoskeletal pain disorders in this group of military personnel.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This inter- and intra-observer reliability study used a test-retest approach with six standardized clinical tests focusing on movement control for back and hip. Thirty-three marines (age 28.7 yrs, SD 5.9) on active duty volunteered and were recruited. They followed an <it>in-vivo</it> observation test procedure that covered both low- and high-load (threshold) tasks relevant for marines on operational duty. Two independent observers simultaneously rated performance as “correct” or “incorrect” following a standardized assessment protocol. Re-testing followed 7–10 days thereafter. Reliability was analysed using kappa (κ) coefficients, while discriminative power of the best-fitting tests for back- and lower-extremity pain was assessed using a multiple-variable regression model.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Inter-observer reliability for the six tests was moderate to almost perfect with κ-coefficients ranging between 0.56-0.95. Three tests reached almost perfect inter-observer reliability with mean κ-coefficients > 0.81. However, intra-observer reliability was fair-to-moderate with mean κ-coefficients between 0.22-0.58. Three tests achieved moderate intra-observer reliability with κ-coefficients > 0.41. Combinations of one low- and one high-threshold test best discriminated prior back pain, but results were inconsistent for lower-extremity pain.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results suggest that clinical tests of movement control of back and hip are reliable for use in screening protocols using several observers with marines. However, test-retest reproducibility was less accurate, which should be considered in follow-up evaluations. The results also indicate that combinations of low- and high-threshold tests have discriminative validity for prior back pain, but were inconclusive for lower-extremity pain.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/263MilitaryMotor controlReproducibilityScreeningSensitivitySpecificityValidity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Monnier Andreas Heuer Joachim Norman Kjell Äng Björn O |
spellingShingle |
Monnier Andreas Heuer Joachim Norman Kjell Äng Björn O Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Military Motor control Reproducibility Screening Sensitivity Specificity Validity |
author_facet |
Monnier Andreas Heuer Joachim Norman Kjell Äng Björn O |
author_sort |
Monnier Andreas |
title |
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
title_short |
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
title_full |
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
title_fullStr |
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
title_sort |
inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinical movement-control tests for marines |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Musculoskeletal disorders particularly in the back and lower extremities are common among marines. Here, movement-control tests are considered clinically useful for screening and follow-up evaluation. However, few studies have addressed the reliability of clinical tests, and no such published data exists for marines. The present aim was therefore to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of clinically convenient tests emphasizing movement control of the back and hip among marines. A secondary aim was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical tests for discriminating musculoskeletal pain disorders in this group of military personnel.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This inter- and intra-observer reliability study used a test-retest approach with six standardized clinical tests focusing on movement control for back and hip. Thirty-three marines (age 28.7 yrs, SD 5.9) on active duty volunteered and were recruited. They followed an <it>in-vivo</it> observation test procedure that covered both low- and high-load (threshold) tasks relevant for marines on operational duty. Two independent observers simultaneously rated performance as “correct” or “incorrect” following a standardized assessment protocol. Re-testing followed 7–10 days thereafter. Reliability was analysed using kappa (κ) coefficients, while discriminative power of the best-fitting tests for back- and lower-extremity pain was assessed using a multiple-variable regression model.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Inter-observer reliability for the six tests was moderate to almost perfect with κ-coefficients ranging between 0.56-0.95. Three tests reached almost perfect inter-observer reliability with mean κ-coefficients > 0.81. However, intra-observer reliability was fair-to-moderate with mean κ-coefficients between 0.22-0.58. Three tests achieved moderate intra-observer reliability with κ-coefficients > 0.41. Combinations of one low- and one high-threshold test best discriminated prior back pain, but results were inconsistent for lower-extremity pain.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results suggest that clinical tests of movement control of back and hip are reliable for use in screening protocols using several observers with marines. However, test-retest reproducibility was less accurate, which should be considered in follow-up evaluations. The results also indicate that combinations of low- and high-threshold tests have discriminative validity for prior back pain, but were inconclusive for lower-extremity pain.</p> |
topic |
Military Motor control Reproducibility Screening Sensitivity Specificity Validity |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/263 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monnierandreas interandintraobserverreliabilityofclinicalmovementcontroltestsformarines AT heuerjoachim interandintraobserverreliabilityofclinicalmovementcontroltestsformarines AT normankjell interandintraobserverreliabilityofclinicalmovementcontroltestsformarines AT angbjorno interandintraobserverreliabilityofclinicalmovementcontroltestsformarines |
_version_ |
1725548500021673984 |