Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study

Purpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt. Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manish Sharma, Suman Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2020-03-01
Series:Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572
id doaj-c62773a216804167a1b87ef0da614278
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c62773a216804167a1b87ef0da6142782020-11-25T03:12:04ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Indian Journal of Neurosurgery2277-954X2277-91672020-03-010901354110.1055/s-0040-1708572Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental StudyManish Sharma0Suman Kumar1Department of Neurosurgery, Command Hospital (NC), Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir, IndiaDepartment of Hematology, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, IndiaPurpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt. Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blocks were created. Results The sensitivity of test to detect any block was found to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–0.81), specificity was 0.71 (0.59–0.81), positive likelihood ratio 2.59 (1.81–3.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (026–0.45). Odds ratio for proximal block was 4.33 (95% CI: 2.01–8.92), and for distal block, it was 10.63 (95% CI: 10.63–22.32). Furthermore, predictive probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator and the test was found to be poor in predicting a patent shunt. Conclusion This is not a very reliable screening test to detect presence of a shunt block. Predicted probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator. This study results are not in conformity with the previously held belief that delayed refilling of chamber would clearly aid the diagnosis of proximal end block. It is strongly felt that a deliberate training of shunt compression test would aid a better diagnostic ability.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572hydrocephalousmanual chamber compression testventriculoperitoneal shuntblocked shunt
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manish Sharma
Suman Kumar
spellingShingle Manish Sharma
Suman Kumar
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
hydrocephalous
manual chamber compression test
ventriculoperitoneal shunt
blocked shunt
author_facet Manish Sharma
Suman Kumar
author_sort Manish Sharma
title Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
title_short Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
title_full Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
title_fullStr Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
title_sort validity of shunt pumping test as a screening modality for shunt block: an experimental study
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
series Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
issn 2277-954X
2277-9167
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Purpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt. Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blocks were created. Results The sensitivity of test to detect any block was found to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–0.81), specificity was 0.71 (0.59–0.81), positive likelihood ratio 2.59 (1.81–3.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (026–0.45). Odds ratio for proximal block was 4.33 (95% CI: 2.01–8.92), and for distal block, it was 10.63 (95% CI: 10.63–22.32). Furthermore, predictive probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator and the test was found to be poor in predicting a patent shunt. Conclusion This is not a very reliable screening test to detect presence of a shunt block. Predicted probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator. This study results are not in conformity with the previously held belief that delayed refilling of chamber would clearly aid the diagnosis of proximal end block. It is strongly felt that a deliberate training of shunt compression test would aid a better diagnostic ability.
topic hydrocephalous
manual chamber compression test
ventriculoperitoneal shunt
blocked shunt
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572
work_keys_str_mv AT manishsharma validityofshuntpumpingtestasascreeningmodalityforshuntblockanexperimentalstudy
AT sumankumar validityofshuntpumpingtestasascreeningmodalityforshuntblockanexperimentalstudy
_version_ 1724651595326554112