Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study
Purpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt. Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Neurosurgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572 |
id |
doaj-c62773a216804167a1b87ef0da614278 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c62773a216804167a1b87ef0da6142782020-11-25T03:12:04ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Indian Journal of Neurosurgery2277-954X2277-91672020-03-010901354110.1055/s-0040-1708572Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental StudyManish Sharma0Suman Kumar1Department of Neurosurgery, Command Hospital (NC), Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir, IndiaDepartment of Hematology, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, IndiaPurpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt. Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blocks were created. Results The sensitivity of test to detect any block was found to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–0.81), specificity was 0.71 (0.59–0.81), positive likelihood ratio 2.59 (1.81–3.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (026–0.45). Odds ratio for proximal block was 4.33 (95% CI: 2.01–8.92), and for distal block, it was 10.63 (95% CI: 10.63–22.32). Furthermore, predictive probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator and the test was found to be poor in predicting a patent shunt. Conclusion This is not a very reliable screening test to detect presence of a shunt block. Predicted probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator. This study results are not in conformity with the previously held belief that delayed refilling of chamber would clearly aid the diagnosis of proximal end block. It is strongly felt that a deliberate training of shunt compression test would aid a better diagnostic ability.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572hydrocephalousmanual chamber compression testventriculoperitoneal shuntblocked shunt |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manish Sharma Suman Kumar |
spellingShingle |
Manish Sharma Suman Kumar Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study Indian Journal of Neurosurgery hydrocephalous manual chamber compression test ventriculoperitoneal shunt blocked shunt |
author_facet |
Manish Sharma Suman Kumar |
author_sort |
Manish Sharma |
title |
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study |
title_short |
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study |
title_full |
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study |
title_fullStr |
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity of Shunt Pumping Test as a Screening Modality for Shunt Block: An Experimental Study |
title_sort |
validity of shunt pumping test as a screening modality for shunt block: an experimental study |
publisher |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
series |
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery |
issn |
2277-954X 2277-9167 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Purpose To ascertain the validity and efficacy of shunt compression test in evaluating a blocked shunt.
Methods An experimental model was created using a Chhabra shunt, and 25 physicians with 1 to 3 years of experience in neurosurgery were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blocks were created.
Results The sensitivity of test to detect any block was found to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–0.81), specificity was 0.71 (0.59–0.81), positive likelihood ratio 2.59 (1.81–3.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (026–0.45). Odds ratio for proximal block was 4.33 (95% CI: 2.01–8.92), and for distal block, it was 10.63 (95% CI: 10.63–22.32). Furthermore, predictive probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator and the test was found to be poor in predicting a patent shunt.
Conclusion This is not a very reliable screening test to detect presence of a shunt block. Predicted probability for shunt block was maximum when both the ends were considered to be blocked by the investigator. This study results are not in conformity with the previously held belief that delayed refilling of chamber would clearly aid the diagnosis of proximal end block. It is strongly felt that a deliberate training of shunt compression test would aid a better diagnostic ability. |
topic |
hydrocephalous manual chamber compression test ventriculoperitoneal shunt blocked shunt |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1708572 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manishsharma validityofshuntpumpingtestasascreeningmodalityforshuntblockanexperimentalstudy AT sumankumar validityofshuntpumpingtestasascreeningmodalityforshuntblockanexperimentalstudy |
_version_ |
1724651595326554112 |