Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study

This article describes how remittances have been represented in social scientific texts. Social scientists have predominantly linked discussions about remittances to discussions about development, and many observations regarding remittances have been put into theoretical models where their main purp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olav Eggebø
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Centroamericana de Managua 2010-12-01
Series:Encuentro
Subjects:
Online Access:http://encuentro.uca.edu.ni/images/stories/2012/pdf/87e/87e2a.pdf
id doaj-c623b64201f74ac588e6060c82e3fca2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c623b64201f74ac588e6060c82e3fca22020-11-24T21:16:13ZspaUniversidad Centroamericana de ManaguaEncuentro0424-96742220-71122010-12-01872637Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study Olav EggebøThis article describes how remittances have been represented in social scientific texts. Social scientists have predominantly linked discussions about remittances to discussions about development, and many observations regarding remittances have been put into theoretical models where their main purpose has been to verifythose models of thought. Remittances have been presented as significant because of the instrumental effects they have for the economy, the society and/or the political system. In this way, discourses on remittances can illuminate not only views onremittances, they can also illuminate intrinsic views of how the world should look like.Remittances have merely been considered in the light of macro models and systems theory, detached from the persons that are in fact the senders and receivers of this money. In this article it is argued that these remittances should not be considered in an instrumental way. The “flow” of remittances is significantly regulated and sanctioned by moral representations linked to structures like household, family and gender. The transactions are manifestations of the personal relations between the actors of the transaction, and cannot be reduced into a model that treats the actorsas isolated individuals.http://encuentro.uca.edu.ni/images/stories/2012/pdf/87e/87e2a.pdfRemittancesTransactions-ActorsPersonal Relations
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olav Eggebø
spellingShingle Olav Eggebø
Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
Encuentro
Remittances
Transactions-Actors
Personal Relations
author_facet Olav Eggebø
author_sort Olav Eggebø
title Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
title_short Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
title_full Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
title_fullStr Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
title_full_unstemmed Free Flow or Morality Bought: On the Construction of Remittances as an Object of Study
title_sort free flow or morality bought: on the construction of remittances as an object of study
publisher Universidad Centroamericana de Managua
series Encuentro
issn 0424-9674
2220-7112
publishDate 2010-12-01
description This article describes how remittances have been represented in social scientific texts. Social scientists have predominantly linked discussions about remittances to discussions about development, and many observations regarding remittances have been put into theoretical models where their main purpose has been to verifythose models of thought. Remittances have been presented as significant because of the instrumental effects they have for the economy, the society and/or the political system. In this way, discourses on remittances can illuminate not only views onremittances, they can also illuminate intrinsic views of how the world should look like.Remittances have merely been considered in the light of macro models and systems theory, detached from the persons that are in fact the senders and receivers of this money. In this article it is argued that these remittances should not be considered in an instrumental way. The “flow” of remittances is significantly regulated and sanctioned by moral representations linked to structures like household, family and gender. The transactions are manifestations of the personal relations between the actors of the transaction, and cannot be reduced into a model that treats the actorsas isolated individuals.
topic Remittances
Transactions-Actors
Personal Relations
url http://encuentro.uca.edu.ni/images/stories/2012/pdf/87e/87e2a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT olaveggebø freeflowormoralityboughtontheconstructionofremittancesasanobjectofstudy
_version_ 1726016456530853888