Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
Learning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been s...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI |
id |
doaj-c608baaa83a24812a21bef3bf9d37bfe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c608baaa83a24812a21bef3bf9d37bfe2021-03-03T19:54:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0151e897310.1371/journal.pone.0008973Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.Daniel A BraunStephan WaldertAd AertsenDaniel M WolpertCarsten MehringLearning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been shown both in cognitive and motor neuroscience that humans are not only able to learn particular stimulus-response mappings, but are also able to extract abstract structural invariants that facilitate generalization to novel tasks. Here we show how such structure learning can enhance facilitation in a sensorimotor association task performed by human subjects. Using regression and reinforcement learning models we show that the observed facilitation cannot be explained by these basic models of learning stimulus-response associations. We show, however, that the observed data can be explained by a hierarchical Bayesian model that performs structure learning. In line with previous results from cognitive tasks, this suggests that hierarchical Bayesian inference might provide a common framework to explain both the learning of specific stimulus-response associations and the learning of abstract structures that are shared by different task environments.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel A Braun Stephan Waldert Ad Aertsen Daniel M Wolpert Carsten Mehring |
spellingShingle |
Daniel A Braun Stephan Waldert Ad Aertsen Daniel M Wolpert Carsten Mehring Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Daniel A Braun Stephan Waldert Ad Aertsen Daniel M Wolpert Carsten Mehring |
author_sort |
Daniel A Braun |
title |
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
title_short |
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
title_full |
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
title_fullStr |
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
title_sort |
structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
Learning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been shown both in cognitive and motor neuroscience that humans are not only able to learn particular stimulus-response mappings, but are also able to extract abstract structural invariants that facilitate generalization to novel tasks. Here we show how such structure learning can enhance facilitation in a sensorimotor association task performed by human subjects. Using regression and reinforcement learning models we show that the observed facilitation cannot be explained by these basic models of learning stimulus-response associations. We show, however, that the observed data can be explained by a hierarchical Bayesian model that performs structure learning. In line with previous results from cognitive tasks, this suggests that hierarchical Bayesian inference might provide a common framework to explain both the learning of specific stimulus-response associations and the learning of abstract structures that are shared by different task environments. |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielabraun structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask AT stephanwaldert structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask AT adaertsen structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask AT danielmwolpert structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask AT carstenmehring structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask |
_version_ |
1714825107719847936 |