Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Learning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel A Braun, Stephan Waldert, Ad Aertsen, Daniel M Wolpert, Carsten Mehring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI
id doaj-c608baaa83a24812a21bef3bf9d37bfe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c608baaa83a24812a21bef3bf9d37bfe2021-03-03T19:54:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0151e897310.1371/journal.pone.0008973Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.Daniel A BraunStephan WaldertAd AertsenDaniel M WolpertCarsten MehringLearning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been shown both in cognitive and motor neuroscience that humans are not only able to learn particular stimulus-response mappings, but are also able to extract abstract structural invariants that facilitate generalization to novel tasks. Here we show how such structure learning can enhance facilitation in a sensorimotor association task performed by human subjects. Using regression and reinforcement learning models we show that the observed facilitation cannot be explained by these basic models of learning stimulus-response associations. We show, however, that the observed data can be explained by a hierarchical Bayesian model that performs structure learning. In line with previous results from cognitive tasks, this suggests that hierarchical Bayesian inference might provide a common framework to explain both the learning of specific stimulus-response associations and the learning of abstract structures that are shared by different task environments.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel A Braun
Stephan Waldert
Ad Aertsen
Daniel M Wolpert
Carsten Mehring
spellingShingle Daniel A Braun
Stephan Waldert
Ad Aertsen
Daniel M Wolpert
Carsten Mehring
Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daniel A Braun
Stephan Waldert
Ad Aertsen
Daniel M Wolpert
Carsten Mehring
author_sort Daniel A Braun
title Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
title_short Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
title_full Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
title_fullStr Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
title_full_unstemmed Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
title_sort structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Learning is often understood as an organism's gradual acquisition of the association between a given sensory stimulus and the correct motor response. Mathematically, this corresponds to regressing a mapping between the set of observations and the set of actions. Recently, however, it has been shown both in cognitive and motor neuroscience that humans are not only able to learn particular stimulus-response mappings, but are also able to extract abstract structural invariants that facilitate generalization to novel tasks. Here we show how such structure learning can enhance facilitation in a sensorimotor association task performed by human subjects. Using regression and reinforcement learning models we show that the observed facilitation cannot be explained by these basic models of learning stimulus-response associations. We show, however, that the observed data can be explained by a hierarchical Bayesian model that performs structure learning. In line with previous results from cognitive tasks, this suggests that hierarchical Bayesian inference might provide a common framework to explain both the learning of specific stimulus-response associations and the learning of abstract structures that are shared by different task environments.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20126409/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT danielabraun structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask
AT stephanwaldert structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask
AT adaertsen structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask
AT danielmwolpert structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask
AT carstenmehring structurelearninginasensorimotorassociationtask
_version_ 1714825107719847936