Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of adverse events (AE) associated with nevirapine use are needed to better understand reports of severe rash or liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV+ women. METHODOLOGY: AE rates following ART initiation were retrospectively assessed in a multi-site cohort of 612 women. Predict...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erika Aaron, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Shannon Criniti, Ellen Tedaldi, Ed Gracely, Amy Warriner, Ritu Kumar, Laura H Bachmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2935387?pdf=render
id doaj-c5fa1234e30e41dc87943cd6223612ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5fa1234e30e41dc87943cd6223612ba2020-11-24T21:46:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0159e1261710.1371/journal.pone.0012617Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.Erika AaronMirjam-Colette KempfShannon CrinitiEllen TedaldiEd GracelyAmy WarrinerRitu KumarLaura H BachmannBACKGROUND: Predictors of adverse events (AE) associated with nevirapine use are needed to better understand reports of severe rash or liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV+ women. METHODOLOGY: AE rates following ART initiation were retrospectively assessed in a multi-site cohort of 612 women. Predictors of onset of rash or LEE were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 612 subjects, 152 (24.8%) initiated NVP-based regimens with 86 (56.6%) pregnant; 460 (75.2%) initiated non-NVP regimens with 67 (14.6%) pregnant. LEE: No significant difference was found between regimens in the development of new grade ≥2 LEE (p  =  0.885). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated an increased likelihood of LEE with HCV co-infection (OR 2.502, 95% CI: 1.04 to 6, p =  0.040); pregnancy, NVP-based regimen, and baseline CD4 >250 cells/mm(3) were not associated with this toxicity. RASH: NVP initiation was associated with rash after controlling for CD4 and pregnancy (OR 2.78; 95%CI: 1.14-6.76), as was baseline CD4 >250 cells/mm(3) when controlling for pregnancy and type of regimen (OR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.19-6.02 p  =  0.017). CONCLUSIONS: CD4 at initiation of therapy was a predictor of rash but not LEE with NVP use in HIV+ women. Pregnancy was not an independent risk factor for the development of AEs assessed. The findings from this study have significant implications for women of child-bearing age initiating NVP-based ART particularly in resource limited settings. This study sheds more confidence on the lack of LEE risk and the need to monitor rash with the use of this medication.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2935387?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erika Aaron
Mirjam-Colette Kempf
Shannon Criniti
Ellen Tedaldi
Ed Gracely
Amy Warriner
Ritu Kumar
Laura H Bachmann
spellingShingle Erika Aaron
Mirjam-Colette Kempf
Shannon Criniti
Ellen Tedaldi
Ed Gracely
Amy Warriner
Ritu Kumar
Laura H Bachmann
Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Erika Aaron
Mirjam-Colette Kempf
Shannon Criniti
Ellen Tedaldi
Ed Gracely
Amy Warriner
Ritu Kumar
Laura H Bachmann
author_sort Erika Aaron
title Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
title_short Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
title_full Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
title_fullStr Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events in a cohort of HIV infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
title_sort adverse events in a cohort of hiv infected pregnant and non-pregnant women treated with nevirapine versus non-nevirapine antiretroviral medication.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Predictors of adverse events (AE) associated with nevirapine use are needed to better understand reports of severe rash or liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV+ women. METHODOLOGY: AE rates following ART initiation were retrospectively assessed in a multi-site cohort of 612 women. Predictors of onset of rash or LEE were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 612 subjects, 152 (24.8%) initiated NVP-based regimens with 86 (56.6%) pregnant; 460 (75.2%) initiated non-NVP regimens with 67 (14.6%) pregnant. LEE: No significant difference was found between regimens in the development of new grade ≥2 LEE (p  =  0.885). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated an increased likelihood of LEE with HCV co-infection (OR 2.502, 95% CI: 1.04 to 6, p =  0.040); pregnancy, NVP-based regimen, and baseline CD4 >250 cells/mm(3) were not associated with this toxicity. RASH: NVP initiation was associated with rash after controlling for CD4 and pregnancy (OR 2.78; 95%CI: 1.14-6.76), as was baseline CD4 >250 cells/mm(3) when controlling for pregnancy and type of regimen (OR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.19-6.02 p  =  0.017). CONCLUSIONS: CD4 at initiation of therapy was a predictor of rash but not LEE with NVP use in HIV+ women. Pregnancy was not an independent risk factor for the development of AEs assessed. The findings from this study have significant implications for women of child-bearing age initiating NVP-based ART particularly in resource limited settings. This study sheds more confidence on the lack of LEE risk and the need to monitor rash with the use of this medication.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2935387?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT erikaaaron adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT mirjamcolettekempf adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT shannoncriniti adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT ellentedaldi adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT edgracely adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT amywarriner adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT ritukumar adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
AT laurahbachmann adverseeventsinacohortofhivinfectedpregnantandnonpregnantwomentreatedwithnevirapineversusnonnevirapineantiretroviralmedication
_version_ 1725900551595491328