Household and maternal risk factors for malaria in pregnancy in a highly endemic area of Uganda: a prospective cohort study

• Main Authors: Jaffer Okiring, Peter Olwoch, Abel Kakuru, Joseph Okou, Harriet Ochokoru, Tedy Andra Ochieng, Richard Kajubi, Moses R. Kamya, Grant Dorsey, Lucy S. Tusting
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2019-04-01
• Series: Malaria Journal
• Subjects: Malaria in pregnancy; Risk factors; Area of high malaria endemicity
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-019-2779-x

Abstract Background Malaria in pregnancy is a major public health challenge, but its risk factors remain poorly understood in some settings. This study assessed the association between household and maternal characteristics and malaria among pregnant women in a high transmission area of Uganda. Methods A nested prospective study was conducted between 6th September 2016 and 5th December 2017 in Busia district. 782 HIV uninfected women were enrolled in the parent study with convenience sampling. Socioeconomic and house construction data were collected via a household survey after enrolment. Homes were classified as modern (plaster or cement walls, metal or wooden roof and closed eaves) or traditional (all other homes). Maternal and household risk factors were evaluated for three outcomes: (1) malaria parasitaemia at enrolment, measured by thick blood smear and qPCR, (2) malaria parasitaemia during pregnancy following initiation of IPTp, measured by thick blood smear and qPCR and (3) placental malaria measured by histopathology. Results A total of 753 of 782 women were included in the analysis. Most women had no or primary education (75%) and lived in traditional houses (77%). At enrolment, microscopic or sub-microscopic parasitaemia was associated with house type (traditional versus modern: adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.29, 95% confidence intervals 1.15–1.45, p < 0.001), level of education (primary or no education versus O-level or beyond: aRR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.24, p = 0.02), and gravidity (primigravida versus multigravida: aRR 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.18, p = 0.009). After initiation of IPTp, microscopic or sub-microscopic parasitaemia was associated with wealth index (poorest versus least poor: aRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10–1.39, p < 0.001), house type (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28, p = 0.03), education level (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.34, p = 0.002) and gravidity (aRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.20–1.45, p < 0.001). Placental malaria was associated with gravidity (aRR 2.87, 95% CI 2.39–3.45, p < 0.001), but not with household characteristics. Conclusions In an area of high malaria transmission, primigravid women and those belonging to the poorest households, living in traditional homes and with the least education had the greatest risk of malaria during pregnancy.