Comparison of Efficacy of Different Surgical Techniques for Benign Prostatic Obstruction

• Main Authors: Jiwoong Yu, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Soo Jeon, Sung Won Lee, Kyu-Sung Lee
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korean Continence Society 2021-09-01
• Series: International Neurourology Journal
• Subjects: benign prostatic obstruction; benign prostatic hyperplasia; holmium laser enucleation of prostate; transurethral resection of prostate; laser vaporization prostatectomy; urinary bladder neck obstruction
• Online Access: http://www.einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-2040314-157.pdf
• ISSN: 2093-4777; 2093-6931

Purpose We compared success rates of 3 surgical techniques (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP], transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], and photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy [PVP]) for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). We aimed to identify preoperative clinical variables and urodynamic parameters that predict surgical success. Methods A total of 483 patients who underwent surgical treatment for BPO at Samsung Medical Center between 2006 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed; of these 361, 81, and 41 patients underwent HoLEP, TURP, and PVP, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, urodynamic parameters, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)/quality of life (QoL) index were evaluated preoperatively; uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and IPSS/QoL index were measured 6 months postoperatively. Surgical success was defined based on IPSS, maximum flow rate, and QoL index and predictive factors were identified using multiple logistic regression analyses. Results Success rates of HoLEP, TURP, and PVP were 67.6%, 65.4%, and 34.1%, respectively, and the HoLEP and TURP groups were not significantly different. Regression analysis revealed prostate volume ≥50 mL and bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) ≥40 to be independent factors predicting HoLEP success. Only high preoperative QoL could predict the success of TURP, whereas other urodynamic parameters remained unrelated. Conclusions Patients treated with HoLEP and TURP displayed equivalent efficacies, but PVP was relatively less efficient than both. Preoperative variables of prostate volume ≥50 mL and BOOI ≥40 were independent predictive factors for the success of HoLEP but not of TURP.