Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To understand racial and ethnic disparities in health care utilization and their potential underlying causes, valid information on race and ethnicity is necessary. However, the validity of pediatric race and ethnicity information in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Wansu, Jacobsen Steven J, Strickland Daniel, Getahun Darios T, Langer-Gould Annette, Iyer Rajan L, Smith Ning, Derose Stephen F, Koebnick Corinna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/316
id doaj-c5e8bb674bee402a840046fe2c679be2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5e8bb674bee402a840046fe2c679be22020-11-24T23:28:39ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-11-0110131610.1186/1472-6963-10-316Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in childrenChen WansuJacobsen Steven JStrickland DanielGetahun Darios TLanger-Gould AnnetteIyer Rajan LSmith NingDerose Stephen FKoebnick Corinna<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To understand racial and ethnic disparities in health care utilization and their potential underlying causes, valid information on race and ethnicity is necessary. However, the validity of pediatric race and ethnicity information in administrative records from large integrated health care systems using electronic medical records is largely unknown.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Information on race and ethnicity of 325,810 children born between 1998-2008 was extracted from health plan administrative records and compared to birth certificate records. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for correct classification of race and ethnicity in administrative records compared to birth certificate records.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Misclassification of ethnicity and race in administrative records occurred in 23.1% and 33.6% children, respectively; the majority due to missing ethnicity (48.3%) and race (40.9%) information. Misclassification was most common in children of minority groups. PPV for White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaskan Native, multiple and other was 89.3%, 86.6%, 73.8%, 18.2%, 51.8% and 1.2%, respectively. PPV for Hispanic ethnicity was 95.6%. Racial and ethnic information improved with increasing number of medical visits. Subgroup analyses comparing racial classification between non-Hispanics and Hispanics showed White, Black and Asian race was more accurate among non-Hispanics than Hispanics.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In children, race and ethnicity information from administrative records has significant limitations in accurately identifying small minority groups. These results suggest that the quality of racial information obtained from administrative records may benefit from additional supplementation by birth certificate data.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/316
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chen Wansu
Jacobsen Steven J
Strickland Daniel
Getahun Darios T
Langer-Gould Annette
Iyer Rajan L
Smith Ning
Derose Stephen F
Koebnick Corinna
spellingShingle Chen Wansu
Jacobsen Steven J
Strickland Daniel
Getahun Darios T
Langer-Gould Annette
Iyer Rajan L
Smith Ning
Derose Stephen F
Koebnick Corinna
Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Chen Wansu
Jacobsen Steven J
Strickland Daniel
Getahun Darios T
Langer-Gould Annette
Iyer Rajan L
Smith Ning
Derose Stephen F
Koebnick Corinna
author_sort Chen Wansu
title Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
title_short Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
title_full Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
title_fullStr Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
title_full_unstemmed Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
title_sort health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2010-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To understand racial and ethnic disparities in health care utilization and their potential underlying causes, valid information on race and ethnicity is necessary. However, the validity of pediatric race and ethnicity information in administrative records from large integrated health care systems using electronic medical records is largely unknown.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Information on race and ethnicity of 325,810 children born between 1998-2008 was extracted from health plan administrative records and compared to birth certificate records. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for correct classification of race and ethnicity in administrative records compared to birth certificate records.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Misclassification of ethnicity and race in administrative records occurred in 23.1% and 33.6% children, respectively; the majority due to missing ethnicity (48.3%) and race (40.9%) information. Misclassification was most common in children of minority groups. PPV for White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaskan Native, multiple and other was 89.3%, 86.6%, 73.8%, 18.2%, 51.8% and 1.2%, respectively. PPV for Hispanic ethnicity was 95.6%. Racial and ethnic information improved with increasing number of medical visits. Subgroup analyses comparing racial classification between non-Hispanics and Hispanics showed White, Black and Asian race was more accurate among non-Hispanics than Hispanics.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In children, race and ethnicity information from administrative records has significant limitations in accurately identifying small minority groups. These results suggest that the quality of racial information obtained from administrative records may benefit from additional supplementation by birth certificate data.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/316
work_keys_str_mv AT chenwansu healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT jacobsenstevenj healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT stricklanddaniel healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT getahundariost healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT langergouldannette healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT iyerrajanl healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT smithning healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT derosestephenf healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
AT koebnickcorinna healthplanadministrativerecordsversusbirthcertificaterecordsqualityofraceandethnicityinformationinchildren
_version_ 1725548499192250368