Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?

In the early 1990s the life sciences quickly adopted online databases to facilitate wide-spread dissemination and use of scientific data. Starting in 1991, the journal 'Nucleic Acids Research' published an annual Database Issue dedicated to articles describing molecular biology databases....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heidi J. Imker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-03-01
Series:Data Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1085
id doaj-c5d937792eb4412fa31f54a7028f1bd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5d937792eb4412fa31f54a7028f1bd42020-11-25T02:48:52ZengUbiquity PressData Science Journal1683-14702020-03-0119110.5334/dsj-2020-008763Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?Heidi J. Imker0University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignIn the early 1990s the life sciences quickly adopted online databases to facilitate wide-spread dissemination and use of scientific data. Starting in 1991, the journal 'Nucleic Acids Research' published an annual Database Issue dedicated to articles describing molecular biology databases. Analysis of these articles reveals a set of long-lived databases which have remained available for more than 15 years. Given the pervasive challenge of sustaining community resources, these databases provide an opportunity to examine what factors contribute to persistence by addressing two questions 1) which organizations fund these long-lived databases? and 2) which organizations maintain these long-lived databases? Funding and operating organizations for 67 databases were determined through review of Database Issue articles. The results reveal a diverse set of contributing organizations with financial and operational support spread across six categories: academic, consortium/collective, government, industry, philanthropic, and society/association. The majority of databases reported support from more than one funding organization, of which government organizations were most common source of funds. Operational responsibilities were more distributed, with academic organizations serving as the most common hosts. Although there is evidence of diversification overall, the most acknowledged funding and operating organizations contribute to disproportionately large percentages of the long-lived databases investigated here.https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1085online databasesresearch infrastructuresustainabilitydata sharingmolecular biology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heidi J. Imker
spellingShingle Heidi J. Imker
Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
Data Science Journal
online databases
research infrastructure
sustainability
data sharing
molecular biology
author_facet Heidi J. Imker
author_sort Heidi J. Imker
title Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
title_short Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
title_full Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
title_fullStr Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
title_full_unstemmed Who Bears the Burden of Long-Lived Molecular Biology Databases?
title_sort who bears the burden of long-lived molecular biology databases?
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Data Science Journal
issn 1683-1470
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In the early 1990s the life sciences quickly adopted online databases to facilitate wide-spread dissemination and use of scientific data. Starting in 1991, the journal 'Nucleic Acids Research' published an annual Database Issue dedicated to articles describing molecular biology databases. Analysis of these articles reveals a set of long-lived databases which have remained available for more than 15 years. Given the pervasive challenge of sustaining community resources, these databases provide an opportunity to examine what factors contribute to persistence by addressing two questions 1) which organizations fund these long-lived databases? and 2) which organizations maintain these long-lived databases? Funding and operating organizations for 67 databases were determined through review of Database Issue articles. The results reveal a diverse set of contributing organizations with financial and operational support spread across six categories: academic, consortium/collective, government, industry, philanthropic, and society/association. The majority of databases reported support from more than one funding organization, of which government organizations were most common source of funds. Operational responsibilities were more distributed, with academic organizations serving as the most common hosts. Although there is evidence of diversification overall, the most acknowledged funding and operating organizations contribute to disproportionately large percentages of the long-lived databases investigated here.
topic online databases
research infrastructure
sustainability
data sharing
molecular biology
url https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1085
work_keys_str_mv AT heidijimker whobearstheburdenoflonglivedmolecularbiologydatabases
_version_ 1724746080683294720