Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée
The paper analyses three works having employed a similar narrative strategy which triggers tension between the explicable and inexplicable and an interpretative crisis that allows a fantastic reading of the fictional text. This strategy is related to the paradoxical statute of the narrator due to w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Wydawnictwo Werset
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Quêtes Littéraires |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://czasopisma.kul.pl/ql/article/view/154 |
| id |
doaj-c5cfff5db23441fd882d38ff1ec96ce2 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-c5cfff5db23441fd882d38ff1ec96ce22020-11-25T00:50:04ZfraWydawnictwo WersetQuêtes Littéraires2084-80992017-12-01710.31743/ql.154Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de MériméeAlexandra Jeleva The paper analyses three works having employed a similar narrative strategy which triggers tension between the explicable and inexplicable and an interpretative crisis that allows a fantastic reading of the fictional text. This strategy is related to the paradoxical statute of the narrator due to which the reader is faced with an incomplete elliptic account because of the former’s reluctance (or impossibility) to offer a definite interpretation of the events. http://czasopisma.kul.pl/ql/article/view/154narrative strategyinterpretative crisisfantastic readingclueparalipse |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
fra |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Alexandra Jeleva |
| spellingShingle |
Alexandra Jeleva Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée Quêtes Littéraires narrative strategy interpretative crisis fantastic reading clue paralipse |
| author_facet |
Alexandra Jeleva |
| author_sort |
Alexandra Jeleva |
| title |
Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée |
| title_short |
Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée |
| title_full |
Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée |
| title_fullStr |
Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans Fragoletta (1829) de Latouche et La Vénus d’Ille (1837) et Lokis (1869) de Mérimée |
| title_sort |
un silence éloquent : narration et fantastique dans fragoletta (1829) de latouche et la vénus d’ille (1837) et lokis (1869) de mérimée |
| publisher |
Wydawnictwo Werset |
| series |
Quêtes Littéraires |
| issn |
2084-8099 |
| publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
| description |
The paper analyses three works having employed a similar narrative strategy which triggers tension between the explicable and inexplicable and an interpretative crisis that allows a fantastic reading of the fictional text. This strategy is related to the paradoxical statute of the narrator due to which the reader is faced with an incomplete elliptic account because of the former’s reluctance (or impossibility) to offer a definite interpretation of the events.
|
| topic |
narrative strategy interpretative crisis fantastic reading clue paralipse |
| url |
http://czasopisma.kul.pl/ql/article/view/154 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandrajeleva unsilenceeloquentnarrationetfantastiquedansfragoletta1829delatoucheetlavenusdille1837etlokis1869demerimee |
| _version_ |
1725249489601560576 |