Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era

Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evelien De Sutter, Birte Coopmans, Femke Vanendert, Marc Dooms, Karel Allegaert, Pascal Borry, Isabelle Huys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.724431/full
id doaj-c5c4e757d4c742448940816238f84745
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5c4e757d4c742448940816238f847452021-09-04T01:46:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602021-09-01910.3389/fped.2021.724431724431Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital EraEvelien De Sutter0Birte Coopmans1Femke Vanendert2Marc Dooms3Karel Allegaert4Karel Allegaert5Karel Allegaert6Pascal Borry7Isabelle Huys8Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsCentre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumBackground: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method.Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC.Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.724431/fullnewborninfanthealth care professionalqualitative researchclinical trialethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evelien De Sutter
Birte Coopmans
Femke Vanendert
Marc Dooms
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Pascal Borry
Isabelle Huys
spellingShingle Evelien De Sutter
Birte Coopmans
Femke Vanendert
Marc Dooms
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Pascal Borry
Isabelle Huys
Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
Frontiers in Pediatrics
newborn
infant
health care professional
qualitative research
clinical trial
ethics
author_facet Evelien De Sutter
Birte Coopmans
Femke Vanendert
Marc Dooms
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
Pascal Borry
Isabelle Huys
author_sort Evelien De Sutter
title Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_short Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_full Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_fullStr Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_sort clinical research in neonates: redesigning the informed consent process in the digital era
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
issn 2296-2360
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method.Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC.Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach.
topic newborn
infant
health care professional
qualitative research
clinical trial
ethics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.724431/full
work_keys_str_mv AT eveliendesutter clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT birtecoopmans clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT femkevanendert clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT marcdooms clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT karelallegaert clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT karelallegaert clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT karelallegaert clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT pascalborry clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT isabellehuys clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
_version_ 1717815623588773888