On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
Various approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensiona...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Physics Letters B |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492 |
id |
doaj-c5aa52081f7d4a2c9364739a2237c716 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c5aa52081f7d4a2c9364739a2237c7162020-11-24T23:23:10ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26931873-24452014-10-01737C28929210.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.072On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energyC. Schmitt0K. Mazurek1P.N. Nadtochy2Grand Accélérateur National d'Ions Lourds, CEA/DSM–CNRS/IN2P3, 14076 Caen, FranceThe Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics – PAN, 31-342 Kraków, PolandOmsk State University, Department of Theoretical Physics, 644077 Omsk, RussiaVarious approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensional Langevin equation using a macroscopic potential energy landscape are performed, and found to consistently describe available measurements. This observation calls into question the robustness of recent analysis based on statistical-model calculations and concluding, on the contrary, to substantial shell effects at the fission saddle point in Po206,210. The inconsistency in interpretation reached by the two approaches shows that, depending on the system, the conclusion can be strongly model-dependent. Although this may not be surprising, it emphasizes the today still limited reliability of firmly extracting fundamental nuclear properties from customary analysis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492Compound-nucleus fissionStatistical and dynamical modelsShell correction at saddle point |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
C. Schmitt K. Mazurek P.N. Nadtochy |
spellingShingle |
C. Schmitt K. Mazurek P.N. Nadtochy On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy Physics Letters B Compound-nucleus fission Statistical and dynamical models Shell correction at saddle point |
author_facet |
C. Schmitt K. Mazurek P.N. Nadtochy |
author_sort |
C. Schmitt |
title |
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
title_short |
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
title_full |
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
title_fullStr |
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
title_full_unstemmed |
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
title_sort |
on current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics Letters B |
issn |
0370-2693 1873-2445 |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
Various approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensional Langevin equation using a macroscopic potential energy landscape are performed, and found to consistently describe available measurements. This observation calls into question the robustness of recent analysis based on statistical-model calculations and concluding, on the contrary, to substantial shell effects at the fission saddle point in Po206,210. The inconsistency in interpretation reached by the two approaches shows that, depending on the system, the conclusion can be strongly model-dependent. Although this may not be surprising, it emphasizes the today still limited reliability of firmly extracting fundamental nuclear properties from customary analysis. |
topic |
Compound-nucleus fission Statistical and dynamical models Shell correction at saddle point |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cschmitt oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy AT kmazurek oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy AT pnnadtochy oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy |
_version_ |
1725564796924854272 |