On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy

Various approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Schmitt, K. Mazurek, P.N. Nadtochy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-10-01
Series:Physics Letters B
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492
id doaj-c5aa52081f7d4a2c9364739a2237c716
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5aa52081f7d4a2c9364739a2237c7162020-11-24T23:23:10ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26931873-24452014-10-01737C28929210.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.072On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energyC. Schmitt0K. Mazurek1P.N. Nadtochy2Grand Accélérateur National d'Ions Lourds, CEA/DSM–CNRS/IN2P3, 14076 Caen, FranceThe Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics – PAN, 31-342 Kraków, PolandOmsk State University, Department of Theoretical Physics, 644077 Omsk, RussiaVarious approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensional Langevin equation using a macroscopic potential energy landscape are performed, and found to consistently describe available measurements. This observation calls into question the robustness of recent analysis based on statistical-model calculations and concluding, on the contrary, to substantial shell effects at the fission saddle point in Po206,210. The inconsistency in interpretation reached by the two approaches shows that, depending on the system, the conclusion can be strongly model-dependent. Although this may not be surprising, it emphasizes the today still limited reliability of firmly extracting fundamental nuclear properties from customary analysis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492Compound-nucleus fissionStatistical and dynamical modelsShell correction at saddle point
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Schmitt
K. Mazurek
P.N. Nadtochy
spellingShingle C. Schmitt
K. Mazurek
P.N. Nadtochy
On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
Physics Letters B
Compound-nucleus fission
Statistical and dynamical models
Shell correction at saddle point
author_facet C. Schmitt
K. Mazurek
P.N. Nadtochy
author_sort C. Schmitt
title On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
title_short On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
title_full On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
title_fullStr On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
title_full_unstemmed On current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
title_sort on current ambiguity in the interpretation of fission at intermediate excitation energy
publisher Elsevier
series Physics Letters B
issn 0370-2693
1873-2445
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Various approaches are currently used to interpret experimental data on fission. We critically examine a wide set of observables measured for fission of Po206,210 nuclei at medium excitation energy, and illustrate the ambiguity in current analysis. Dynamical calculations based on the four-dimensional Langevin equation using a macroscopic potential energy landscape are performed, and found to consistently describe available measurements. This observation calls into question the robustness of recent analysis based on statistical-model calculations and concluding, on the contrary, to substantial shell effects at the fission saddle point in Po206,210. The inconsistency in interpretation reached by the two approaches shows that, depending on the system, the conclusion can be strongly model-dependent. Although this may not be surprising, it emphasizes the today still limited reliability of firmly extracting fundamental nuclear properties from customary analysis.
topic Compound-nucleus fission
Statistical and dynamical models
Shell correction at saddle point
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314006492
work_keys_str_mv AT cschmitt oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy
AT kmazurek oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy
AT pnnadtochy oncurrentambiguityintheinterpretationoffissionatintermediateexcitationenergy
_version_ 1725564796924854272