Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey

Although Cultural Heritage as such has a rather positive connotation, bringing together notions of safeguarding and human creativity, critical investigations have underlined the various strategic, economic and political rationalities inscribed in this term. In 2010 the UNESCO rendered the Alevi rit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benjamin Weineck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies 2014-12-01
Series:Middle East : Topics & Arguments
Subjects:
Online Access:http://meta-journal.net/article/view/2164
id doaj-c5a75f3b86014ed3bc0729c50109be53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5a75f3b86014ed3bc0729c50109be532020-11-24T23:04:33ZengCenter for Near and Middle Eastern Studies Middle East : Topics & Arguments2196-629X2014-12-0130921032141Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary TurkeyBenjamin Weineck0Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg Seminar für Sprachen und Kulturen des Vorderen Orients (Islamwissenschaft)Although Cultural Heritage as such has a rather positive connotation, bringing together notions of safeguarding and human creativity, critical investigations have underlined the various strategic, economic and political rationalities inscribed in this term. In 2010 the UNESCO rendered the Alevi ritual sequence semah Intangible Cultural Heritage and as such it was inscribed in the Turkish National Inventory of Cultural Heritage – although Alevis are not recognized by the Turkish state and its Sunni-Turkist understandings of belonging. The celebration of an Alevi ritual as enriching Turkey’s ‘cultural diversity’ thus asks for an analytical approach that comes to terms with this tension of recognition, ongoing political surveillance and the very specific understandings of diversity that are put into play. With reference to Foucaults (and particularly Roses) approach to contemporary government as “governmentality”, Cultural Heritage can be grasped in its ambivalent (but not necessarily conflicting) nature as cultural self-fulfillment and governmental control. The paper thus enlarges the analytical scale of thinking about Cultural Heritage in its correlation with identity-formation, the politics of recognition and governance.http://meta-journal.net/article/view/2164AlevisTurkeyDiversityHeritageGovernmentalityRitual
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Weineck
spellingShingle Benjamin Weineck
Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
Middle East : Topics & Arguments
Alevis
Turkey
Diversity
Heritage
Governmentality
Ritual
author_facet Benjamin Weineck
author_sort Benjamin Weineck
title Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
title_short Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
title_full Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
title_fullStr Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Governmentalities of Alevi Cultural Heritage: On Recognition, Surveillance and "Domesticated Diversity" in Contemporary Turkey
title_sort governmentalities of alevi cultural heritage: on recognition, surveillance and "domesticated diversity" in contemporary turkey
publisher Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies
series Middle East : Topics & Arguments
issn 2196-629X
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Although Cultural Heritage as such has a rather positive connotation, bringing together notions of safeguarding and human creativity, critical investigations have underlined the various strategic, economic and political rationalities inscribed in this term. In 2010 the UNESCO rendered the Alevi ritual sequence semah Intangible Cultural Heritage and as such it was inscribed in the Turkish National Inventory of Cultural Heritage – although Alevis are not recognized by the Turkish state and its Sunni-Turkist understandings of belonging. The celebration of an Alevi ritual as enriching Turkey’s ‘cultural diversity’ thus asks for an analytical approach that comes to terms with this tension of recognition, ongoing political surveillance and the very specific understandings of diversity that are put into play. With reference to Foucaults (and particularly Roses) approach to contemporary government as “governmentality”, Cultural Heritage can be grasped in its ambivalent (but not necessarily conflicting) nature as cultural self-fulfillment and governmental control. The paper thus enlarges the analytical scale of thinking about Cultural Heritage in its correlation with identity-formation, the politics of recognition and governance.
topic Alevis
Turkey
Diversity
Heritage
Governmentality
Ritual
url http://meta-journal.net/article/view/2164
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminweineck governmentalitiesofaleviculturalheritageonrecognitionsurveillanceanddomesticateddiversityincontemporaryturkey
_version_ 1725629719405133824