طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة

There is a general consensus among researchers that the wHm sign in hieroglyph does indeed represent an ox leg as was initially proposed by Alan Gardiner. However, this explanation raises several questions regarding the sign's true origin, as there is no archeological evidence pointing to scene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: The General Union of Arab Archaeologists 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of General Union of Arab Archaeologists
Subjects:
Ox
Online Access:http://jguaa.journals.ekb.eg/article_3349_9aa7968e6c6d1bcf036321d5685226c0.pdf
id doaj-c5a5841e7b7341d6a596988a0704b7b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5a5841e7b7341d6a596988a0704b7b92020-11-25T01:05:56ZaraThe General Union of Arab ArchaeologistsJournal of General Union of Arab Archaeologists2536-98222536-98302016-01-01171724526310.21608/JGUAA.2000.3349طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمةDr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad0Lecturer in the Department of History and Archaeology Faculty of Arts - Alexandria UniversityThere is a general consensus among researchers that the wHm sign in hieroglyph does indeed represent an ox leg as was initially proposed by Alan Gardiner. However, this explanation raises several questions regarding the sign's true origin, as there is no archeological evidence pointing to scenes of an ox’s foreleg being amputated. In fact, no archeological source seems to reveal the role, use, or even appearance of an ox leg, which in turn necessitates that we re-examine the nature of this hieroglyphic sign, as it can reveal much about its intended purpose and meaning. To clarify, I would like to note the distinction between this foreleg and the famous ox thigh XpS present in scenes depicting funerals and everyday life in Ancient Egypt. In order to identify which animal this leg was amputated from and what this implies, we must first return to those scenes depicting cattle and their treatment by Ancient Egyptians. Indeed, various archeological sources reveal a somewhat harsh funerary practice in which a live calf’s foreleg is amputated just above the knee, to then be used as part of a funerary rite at the time of burial. More specifically, it appears that by being presented with the calf’s foreleg, the deceased is then able to be reborn in the afterlife. We knew that offering scenes and lists, doesn't contain any proofs to use a foreleg in their food, so that we can consider its existence in the passages of some private tombs, an important indication of its funerary role. This harsh ritual depicting in some tombs and funerary papyrus, the origin and indication of this ritual will be explain in the research. http://jguaa.journals.ekb.eg/article_3349_9aa7968e6c6d1bcf036321d5685226c0.pdfRitualCalfForelegHarshFuneraryThighOxopening the mouthPriestAmputationRebirthLamentation
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad
spellingShingle Dr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad
طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
Journal of General Union of Arab Archaeologists
Ritual
Calf
Foreleg
Harsh
Funerary
Thigh
Ox
opening the mouth
Priest
Amputation
Rebirth
Lamentation
author_facet Dr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad
author_sort Dr.Emad Ahmed Ibrahim El Sayyad
title طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
title_short طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
title_full طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
title_fullStr طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
title_full_unstemmed طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
title_sort طقسة بتر ساق العجل في مصر القديمة
publisher The General Union of Arab Archaeologists
series Journal of General Union of Arab Archaeologists
issn 2536-9822
2536-9830
publishDate 2016-01-01
description There is a general consensus among researchers that the wHm sign in hieroglyph does indeed represent an ox leg as was initially proposed by Alan Gardiner. However, this explanation raises several questions regarding the sign's true origin, as there is no archeological evidence pointing to scenes of an ox’s foreleg being amputated. In fact, no archeological source seems to reveal the role, use, or even appearance of an ox leg, which in turn necessitates that we re-examine the nature of this hieroglyphic sign, as it can reveal much about its intended purpose and meaning. To clarify, I would like to note the distinction between this foreleg and the famous ox thigh XpS present in scenes depicting funerals and everyday life in Ancient Egypt. In order to identify which animal this leg was amputated from and what this implies, we must first return to those scenes depicting cattle and their treatment by Ancient Egyptians. Indeed, various archeological sources reveal a somewhat harsh funerary practice in which a live calf’s foreleg is amputated just above the knee, to then be used as part of a funerary rite at the time of burial. More specifically, it appears that by being presented with the calf’s foreleg, the deceased is then able to be reborn in the afterlife. We knew that offering scenes and lists, doesn't contain any proofs to use a foreleg in their food, so that we can consider its existence in the passages of some private tombs, an important indication of its funerary role. This harsh ritual depicting in some tombs and funerary papyrus, the origin and indication of this ritual will be explain in the research.
topic Ritual
Calf
Foreleg
Harsh
Funerary
Thigh
Ox
opening the mouth
Priest
Amputation
Rebirth
Lamentation
url http://jguaa.journals.ekb.eg/article_3349_9aa7968e6c6d1bcf036321d5685226c0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dremadahmedibrahimelsayyad ṭqsẗbtrsạqạlʿjlfymṣrạlqdymẗ
_version_ 1725192380141797376