Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review

Objective: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens′ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. Data Sources: We performed this systematic review on the English language lite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xia-Yi Miao, Xiao-Bin Ji, Hai-Wen Lu, Jia-Wei Yang, Jin-Fu Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2015-01-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=20;spage=2792;epage=2797;aulast=Miao
id doaj-c5a48450c50a41619de51c1b3917735e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5a48450c50a41619de51c1b3917735e2020-11-25T00:02:07ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992015-01-01128202792279710.4103/0366-6999.167360Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic ReviewXia-Yi MiaoXiao-Bin JiHai-Wen LuJia-Wei YangJin-Fu XuObjective: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens′ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. Data Sources: We performed this systematic review on the English language literatures from 1966 to July 2014, using various search terms included "pathogens" or "bacteria" or "microbiology" and "bronchiectasis" or "non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis" or "non-CF bronchiectasis" or "NCFB." Study Selection: We included studies of patients with the confirmed non-CF bronchiectasis for which culture methods were required to sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Weighted mean isolation rates for Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Moxarella catarrhails were compared according to different methodology. Results: The total mean bacterial culture positive rates were 63%. For studies using sputum samples, the mean positive culture rates were 74%. For studies using BALF alone or BALF and sputum, it was 48%. The distributions of main bacterial strains were 29% for H. influenzae, 28% for P. aeruginosa, 11% for S. pneumoniae, 12% for S. aureus, and 8% for M. catarrhails with methodology of sputum. Meanwhile, the bacterial distributions were 37% for H. influenzae, 8% for P. aeruginosa, 14% for S. pneumoniae, 5% for S. aureus, and 10% for M. catarrhails with methodology of BALF alone or BALF and sputum. Analysis of the effect of different methodology on the isolation rates revealed some statistically significant differences. Conclusions: H. influenzae accounted for the highest percentage in different methodology. Our results suggested that the total positive culture rates and the proportion of P. aeruginosa from sputum and BALF specimens had significant differences, which can be used in further appropriate recommendations for the treatment of non-CF bronchiectasis.http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=20;spage=2792;epage=2797;aulast=MiaoBronchiectasis; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Pathogens; Sputum
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xia-Yi Miao
Xiao-Bin Ji
Hai-Wen Lu
Jia-Wei Yang
Jin-Fu Xu
spellingShingle Xia-Yi Miao
Xiao-Bin Ji
Hai-Wen Lu
Jia-Wei Yang
Jin-Fu Xu
Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
Chinese Medical Journal
Bronchiectasis; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Pathogens; Sputum
author_facet Xia-Yi Miao
Xiao-Bin Ji
Hai-Wen Lu
Jia-Wei Yang
Jin-Fu Xu
author_sort Xia-Yi Miao
title Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
title_short Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
title_full Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
title_sort distribution of major pathogens from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a systematic review
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Chinese Medical Journal
issn 0366-6999
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens′ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. Data Sources: We performed this systematic review on the English language literatures from 1966 to July 2014, using various search terms included "pathogens" or "bacteria" or "microbiology" and "bronchiectasis" or "non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis" or "non-CF bronchiectasis" or "NCFB." Study Selection: We included studies of patients with the confirmed non-CF bronchiectasis for which culture methods were required to sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Weighted mean isolation rates for Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Moxarella catarrhails were compared according to different methodology. Results: The total mean bacterial culture positive rates were 63%. For studies using sputum samples, the mean positive culture rates were 74%. For studies using BALF alone or BALF and sputum, it was 48%. The distributions of main bacterial strains were 29% for H. influenzae, 28% for P. aeruginosa, 11% for S. pneumoniae, 12% for S. aureus, and 8% for M. catarrhails with methodology of sputum. Meanwhile, the bacterial distributions were 37% for H. influenzae, 8% for P. aeruginosa, 14% for S. pneumoniae, 5% for S. aureus, and 10% for M. catarrhails with methodology of BALF alone or BALF and sputum. Analysis of the effect of different methodology on the isolation rates revealed some statistically significant differences. Conclusions: H. influenzae accounted for the highest percentage in different methodology. Our results suggested that the total positive culture rates and the proportion of P. aeruginosa from sputum and BALF specimens had significant differences, which can be used in further appropriate recommendations for the treatment of non-CF bronchiectasis.
topic Bronchiectasis; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Pathogens; Sputum
url http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=20;spage=2792;epage=2797;aulast=Miao
work_keys_str_mv AT xiayimiao distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview
AT xiaobinji distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview
AT haiwenlu distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview
AT jiaweiyang distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview
AT jinfuxu distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview
_version_ 1725439390725963776