GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa

Abstract Background Unlike the studies undertaken on agricultural and hydrological sectors, focused climate change vulnerability researches in urban centers in Ethiopia is not widely available and of recent history. However, as many signals of climate change vulnerability started to happen in urban...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Getnet Feyissa, Gete Zeleke, Ephrem Gebremariam, Woldeamlak Bewket
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-09-01
Series:Geoenvironmental Disasters
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40677-018-0106-4
id doaj-c59560112f914658bf96f8acd8a1e559
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c59560112f914658bf96f8acd8a1e5592020-11-25T01:54:24ZengSpringerOpenGeoenvironmental Disasters2197-86702018-09-015111710.1186/s40677-018-0106-4GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis AbabaGetnet Feyissa0Gete Zeleke1Ephrem Gebremariam2Woldeamlak Bewket3Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Environmental Planning Programme, Addis Ababa UniversityEthiopian Institute of Architecture Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa UniversityEthiopian Institute of Architecture Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa UniversityDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa UniversityAbstract Background Unlike the studies undertaken on agricultural and hydrological sectors, focused climate change vulnerability researches in urban centers in Ethiopia is not widely available and of recent history. However, as many signals of climate change vulnerability started to happen in urban centers as well, it is inevitable to analyze, quantify, map, prioritize and be prepared for adaptation measures. This study is therefore, tried to assess, quantify and map climate change vulnerability in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, by integrating two climate change vulnerability assessment models, namely, the Sullivan and Meigh’s Model of composite climate change vulnerability index and the IPCC’s approach of vulnerability assessment which comprises exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Fifteen sub-components of vulnerability indicators were identified in ten sub-cities (Addis Ketema, Arada, Akaki-Kality, Bole, Gulelle, Kirkos, Kolfe-Keraniyo, Lideta, Nifasilk-Lafto and Yeka) of Addis Ababa. Due to the scale, degree, amount and unit of measurement for the selected indicators varied, their values were normalized to a number which ranges between 0 and 1, indicating as the values increased to 1, vulnerability to climate change increases. The study uses Iyengar and Sudarshan’s unequal weighting system, to assign a weight to all indicators. The results were mapped using ArcGIS 10.2 package. Results The results indicated that the ten sub-cities in Addis Ababa were found in different levels of vulnerability to climate change. The exposure and sensitivity were highest for Addis Ketema, Arada, and Lideta which are found in central parts of the city, with a normalization index value greater than 0.5. The adaptive capacity index is the highest in Gulelle, Bole, and Arada sub-cities. These sub-cities have better quality houses, well-planned districts, good infrastructural facilities and good coverage of green areas compared to others. The overall climate change vulnerability was the highest (normalized index > 0.5) in Arada, Addis Ketema and Lideta, due to the adaptation capacity is the lowest compared to other sub-cities. Conclusion Addis Ababa is vulnerable to climate change impacts and the degree of vulnerability is underpinned by the interaction of multiple factors mainly adaptive capacities of sub-cities, location based characteristics and changes in climatic parameters. These present a need to strengthen mitigation and adaptation activities and prioritize sub cities for intervention based on the degree of vulnerability. It is also understood that the Sullivan and Meigh’s Model and IPCC’s approach for climate change analyses, could be used simultaneously for preparing vulnerability index per different geographical locations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40677-018-0106-4Climate changeExposureSensitivitySullivan and Meigh model, Vulnerability index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Getnet Feyissa
Gete Zeleke
Ephrem Gebremariam
Woldeamlak Bewket
spellingShingle Getnet Feyissa
Gete Zeleke
Ephrem Gebremariam
Woldeamlak Bewket
GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Climate change
Exposure
Sensitivity
Sullivan and Meigh model, Vulnerability index
author_facet Getnet Feyissa
Gete Zeleke
Ephrem Gebremariam
Woldeamlak Bewket
author_sort Getnet Feyissa
title GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
title_short GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
title_full GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
title_fullStr GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
title_full_unstemmed GIS based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in Addis Ababa
title_sort gis based quantification and mapping of climate change vulnerability hotspots in addis ababa
publisher SpringerOpen
series Geoenvironmental Disasters
issn 2197-8670
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Background Unlike the studies undertaken on agricultural and hydrological sectors, focused climate change vulnerability researches in urban centers in Ethiopia is not widely available and of recent history. However, as many signals of climate change vulnerability started to happen in urban centers as well, it is inevitable to analyze, quantify, map, prioritize and be prepared for adaptation measures. This study is therefore, tried to assess, quantify and map climate change vulnerability in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, by integrating two climate change vulnerability assessment models, namely, the Sullivan and Meigh’s Model of composite climate change vulnerability index and the IPCC’s approach of vulnerability assessment which comprises exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Fifteen sub-components of vulnerability indicators were identified in ten sub-cities (Addis Ketema, Arada, Akaki-Kality, Bole, Gulelle, Kirkos, Kolfe-Keraniyo, Lideta, Nifasilk-Lafto and Yeka) of Addis Ababa. Due to the scale, degree, amount and unit of measurement for the selected indicators varied, their values were normalized to a number which ranges between 0 and 1, indicating as the values increased to 1, vulnerability to climate change increases. The study uses Iyengar and Sudarshan’s unequal weighting system, to assign a weight to all indicators. The results were mapped using ArcGIS 10.2 package. Results The results indicated that the ten sub-cities in Addis Ababa were found in different levels of vulnerability to climate change. The exposure and sensitivity were highest for Addis Ketema, Arada, and Lideta which are found in central parts of the city, with a normalization index value greater than 0.5. The adaptive capacity index is the highest in Gulelle, Bole, and Arada sub-cities. These sub-cities have better quality houses, well-planned districts, good infrastructural facilities and good coverage of green areas compared to others. The overall climate change vulnerability was the highest (normalized index > 0.5) in Arada, Addis Ketema and Lideta, due to the adaptation capacity is the lowest compared to other sub-cities. Conclusion Addis Ababa is vulnerable to climate change impacts and the degree of vulnerability is underpinned by the interaction of multiple factors mainly adaptive capacities of sub-cities, location based characteristics and changes in climatic parameters. These present a need to strengthen mitigation and adaptation activities and prioritize sub cities for intervention based on the degree of vulnerability. It is also understood that the Sullivan and Meigh’s Model and IPCC’s approach for climate change analyses, could be used simultaneously for preparing vulnerability index per different geographical locations.
topic Climate change
Exposure
Sensitivity
Sullivan and Meigh model, Vulnerability index
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40677-018-0106-4
work_keys_str_mv AT getnetfeyissa gisbasedquantificationandmappingofclimatechangevulnerabilityhotspotsinaddisababa
AT getezeleke gisbasedquantificationandmappingofclimatechangevulnerabilityhotspotsinaddisababa
AT ephremgebremariam gisbasedquantificationandmappingofclimatechangevulnerabilityhotspotsinaddisababa
AT woldeamlakbewket gisbasedquantificationandmappingofclimatechangevulnerabilityhotspotsinaddisababa
_version_ 1724987659668946944