The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around?
<p>Paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy and iron–sulfur (Fe–S) proteins have maintained a synergic relationship for decades. Indeed, the hyperfine shifts with their temperature dependencies and the relaxation rates of nuclei of cluster-bound residues have been extensively used as a fingerprint of the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Magnetic Resonance |
Online Access: | https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/2/203/2021/mr-2-203-2021.pdf |
id |
doaj-c592d2f662b74e34895a3b7b5eaaad19 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. Camponeschi A. Gallo M. Piccioli M. Piccioli L. Banci L. Banci |
spellingShingle |
F. Camponeschi A. Gallo M. Piccioli M. Piccioli L. Banci L. Banci The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? Magnetic Resonance |
author_facet |
F. Camponeschi A. Gallo M. Piccioli M. Piccioli L. Banci L. Banci |
author_sort |
F. Camponeschi |
title |
The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? |
title_short |
The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? |
title_full |
The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? |
title_fullStr |
The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around? |
title_sort |
long-standing relationship between paramagnetic nmr and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoneet example. an old method for new stories or the other way around? |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Magnetic Resonance |
issn |
2699-0016 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
<p>Paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy and iron–sulfur (Fe–S) proteins have maintained a synergic relationship for decades. Indeed, the hyperfine shifts with their temperature dependencies and the relaxation rates of nuclei of cluster-bound residues have been extensively used as a fingerprint of the type and of the oxidation state of the Fe–S cluster within the protein frame. The identification of NMR signals from residues surrounding the metal cofactor is crucial for understanding the structure–function relationship in Fe–S proteins, but it is generally impaired in standard NMR experiments by
paramagnetic relaxation enhancement due to the presence of the paramagnetic
cluster(s). On the other hand, the availability of systems of different sizes and stabilities has, over the years, stimulated NMR spectroscopists to exploit
iron–sulfur proteins as paradigmatic cases to develop experiments, models, and protocols. Here, the cluster-binding properties of human mitoNEET have been investigated by 1D and 2D <span class="inline-formula"><sup>1</sup></span>H diamagnetic and paramagnetic NMR, in its oxidized and reduced states. The NMR spectra of
both oxidation states of mitoNEET appeared to be significantly different
from those reported for previously investigated <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><mo>[</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><msup><mo>]</mo><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn><mo>+</mo><mo>/</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="58pt" height="17pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="79572f08ecb9017531a5864e5ff2fda1"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="mr-2-203-2021-ie00001.svg" width="58pt" height="17pt" src="mr-2-203-2021-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span>
proteins. The protocol we have developed in this work conjugates
spectroscopic information arising from “classical” paramagnetic NMR with
an extended mapping of the signals of residues around the cluster which can
be taken, even before the sequence-specific assignment is accomplished, as a fingerprint of the protein region constituting the functional site of the protein. We show how the combined use of 1D NOE experiments, <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> direct-detected experiments, and double- and triple-resonance experiments tailored using R<span class="inline-formula"><sub>1</sub></span>- and/or R<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>-based filters significantly reduces the “blind” sphere of the
protein around the paramagnetic cluster. This approach provided a detailed
description of the unique electronic properties of mitoNEET, which are
responsible for its biological function. Indeed, the NMR properties
suggested that the specific electronic structure of the cluster possibly
drives the functional properties of different <span class="inline-formula">[Fe<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>]</span> proteins.</p> |
url |
https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/2/203/2021/mr-2-203-2021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fcamponeschi thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT agallo thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT mpiccioli thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT mpiccioli thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT lbanci thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT lbanci thelongstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT fcamponeschi longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT agallo longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT mpiccioli longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT mpiccioli longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT lbanci longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround AT lbanci longstandingrelationshipbetweenparamagneticnmrandironsulfurproteinsthemitoneetexampleanoldmethodfornewstoriesortheotherwayaround |
_version_ |
1721227440738533376 |
spelling |
doaj-c592d2f662b74e34895a3b7b5eaaad192021-08-02T19:54:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsMagnetic Resonance2699-00162021-04-01220322110.5194/mr-2-203-2021The long-standing relationship between paramagnetic NMR and iron–sulfur proteins: the mitoNEET example. An old method for new stories or the other way around?F. Camponeschi0A. Gallo1M. Piccioli2M. Piccioli3L. Banci4L. Banci5Consorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche MetalloProteine, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, ItalyDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Patras, Patras, 26504, GreeceConsorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche MetalloProteine, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, ItalyMagnetic Resonance Center and Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, ItalyConsorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche MetalloProteine, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, ItalyMagnetic Resonance Center and Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Italy<p>Paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy and iron–sulfur (Fe–S) proteins have maintained a synergic relationship for decades. Indeed, the hyperfine shifts with their temperature dependencies and the relaxation rates of nuclei of cluster-bound residues have been extensively used as a fingerprint of the type and of the oxidation state of the Fe–S cluster within the protein frame. The identification of NMR signals from residues surrounding the metal cofactor is crucial for understanding the structure–function relationship in Fe–S proteins, but it is generally impaired in standard NMR experiments by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement due to the presence of the paramagnetic cluster(s). On the other hand, the availability of systems of different sizes and stabilities has, over the years, stimulated NMR spectroscopists to exploit iron–sulfur proteins as paradigmatic cases to develop experiments, models, and protocols. Here, the cluster-binding properties of human mitoNEET have been investigated by 1D and 2D <span class="inline-formula"><sup>1</sup></span>H diamagnetic and paramagnetic NMR, in its oxidized and reduced states. The NMR spectra of both oxidation states of mitoNEET appeared to be significantly different from those reported for previously investigated <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><mo>[</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><msup><mo>]</mo><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn><mo>+</mo><mo>/</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="58pt" height="17pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="79572f08ecb9017531a5864e5ff2fda1"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="mr-2-203-2021-ie00001.svg" width="58pt" height="17pt" src="mr-2-203-2021-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> proteins. The protocol we have developed in this work conjugates spectroscopic information arising from “classical” paramagnetic NMR with an extended mapping of the signals of residues around the cluster which can be taken, even before the sequence-specific assignment is accomplished, as a fingerprint of the protein region constituting the functional site of the protein. We show how the combined use of 1D NOE experiments, <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> direct-detected experiments, and double- and triple-resonance experiments tailored using R<span class="inline-formula"><sub>1</sub></span>- and/or R<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>-based filters significantly reduces the “blind” sphere of the protein around the paramagnetic cluster. This approach provided a detailed description of the unique electronic properties of mitoNEET, which are responsible for its biological function. Indeed, the NMR properties suggested that the specific electronic structure of the cluster possibly drives the functional properties of different <span class="inline-formula">[Fe<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>]</span> proteins.</p>https://mr.copernicus.org/articles/2/203/2021/mr-2-203-2021.pdf |