The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
In a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the pos...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-09-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312 |
id |
doaj-c580eafa4e6a42e4852da618803a97b6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c580eafa4e6a42e4852da618803a97b62020-11-25T03:17:37ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-09-01610.1177/215824401666731210.1177_2158244016667312The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority UnionismBrad Walchuk0Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, CanadaIn a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the possible move away from Wagner Act unionism toward some form of minority unionism has received some support, this article argues that there are far too many dangers associated with minority unionism, namely, that it will be a corollary for right-to-work laws, will cause infighting between unions, and will divide and fragment workers’ sense of solidarity, and that the supposed benefits that may be attained through constitutionally protected minority unionism can, and should, be attained without it.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brad Walchuk |
spellingShingle |
Brad Walchuk The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Brad Walchuk |
author_sort |
Brad Walchuk |
title |
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism |
title_short |
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism |
title_full |
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism |
title_fullStr |
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism |
title_sort |
pitfalls of embracing minority unionism |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
In a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the possible move away from Wagner Act unionism toward some form of minority unionism has received some support, this article argues that there are far too many dangers associated with minority unionism, namely, that it will be a corollary for right-to-work laws, will cause infighting between unions, and will divide and fragment workers’ sense of solidarity, and that the supposed benefits that may be attained through constitutionally protected minority unionism can, and should, be attained without it. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bradwalchuk thepitfallsofembracingminorityunionism AT bradwalchuk pitfallsofembracingminorityunionism |
_version_ |
1724631072253149184 |