The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism

In a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the pos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brad Walchuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-09-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312
id doaj-c580eafa4e6a42e4852da618803a97b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c580eafa4e6a42e4852da618803a97b62020-11-25T03:17:37ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-09-01610.1177/215824401666731210.1177_2158244016667312The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority UnionismBrad Walchuk0Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, CanadaIn a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the possible move away from Wagner Act unionism toward some form of minority unionism has received some support, this article argues that there are far too many dangers associated with minority unionism, namely, that it will be a corollary for right-to-work laws, will cause infighting between unions, and will divide and fragment workers’ sense of solidarity, and that the supposed benefits that may be attained through constitutionally protected minority unionism can, and should, be attained without it.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brad Walchuk
spellingShingle Brad Walchuk
The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
SAGE Open
author_facet Brad Walchuk
author_sort Brad Walchuk
title The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
title_short The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
title_full The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
title_fullStr The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
title_full_unstemmed The Pitfalls of Embracing Minority Unionism
title_sort pitfalls of embracing minority unionism
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2016-09-01
description In a series of recent cases involving the right to bargain collectively, the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that Wagner Act model, or a model of unionism which is both exclusive and majoritarian, need not be the only model available to workers in Canada (as is currently the case). Although the possible move away from Wagner Act unionism toward some form of minority unionism has received some support, this article argues that there are far too many dangers associated with minority unionism, namely, that it will be a corollary for right-to-work laws, will cause infighting between unions, and will divide and fragment workers’ sense of solidarity, and that the supposed benefits that may be attained through constitutionally protected minority unionism can, and should, be attained without it.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667312
work_keys_str_mv AT bradwalchuk thepitfallsofembracingminorityunionism
AT bradwalchuk pitfallsofembracingminorityunionism
_version_ 1724631072253149184